On 4/21/11 3:19 PM, Tim Berners-Lee wrote:
Martin,
Confused.
Do you mean you want to change the localname (the bit after the namespace in
the URI) or the label?
In your examples below, you have the same string for the localname and label.
This looks like a bug. Let me explain things from the
Martin,
Confused.
Do you mean you want to change the localname (the bit after the namespace in
the URI) or the label?
In your examples below, you have the same string for the localname and label.
This looks like a bug. Let me explain things from the point of view of the
tabulator, for example,
-- Apologies for multiple postings --
6th International Conference on Knowledge Capture
(KCAP2011)
June 26-29, 2011
Hi Bob,
Thanks!
In my opinion, explicit versioning of ontologies should be avoided in general;
rather, one should evolve deployed ontology in a backwards-compatible fashion
only. While there is is quite some academic work on ontology versioning, fact
is that in practice, if you use fine-grained
Hi Martin,
I think this issue is also related to ontology versioning and assigning
an applied version of an ontology in a dataset (see, e.g., [1]).
OWL provides some properties to describe an version of an ontology,
e.g., owl:priorVersion, owl:versionIRI, owl:backwardCompatibleWith (see
[2,3])
Dear all:
I am considering to rename a few conceptual elements in the GoodRelations
ontology. However, they are already in use in data, queries, and applications.
Thus, I am thinking of the least intrusive way of implementing this. I think
this question is also relevant for many other OWL vocab
