Hi,
You can have a look at the OAEI instance matching track 2009 [1] and
2010 [2].
The datasets haven't been manually curated but are the results of
semi-automated interlinking techniques.
You can still compare the results of your tool with others (see [3]).
François
[1] http://oaei.ontology
On 4/28/11 7:37 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
On 28 Apr 2011, at 11:26, Leigh Dodds wrote:
However it may be useful to define a standard response format and
potentially error messages to help client apps/users distinguish
between more fine-grained error states. I suggested this during
discussion o
On 28 Apr 2011, at 11:26, Leigh Dodds wrote:
> However it may be useful to define a standard response format and
> potentially error messages to help client apps/users distinguish
> between more fine-grained error states. I suggested this during
> discussion of the original protocol specification b
Hi,
Changed subject line to match topic:
On 15 April 2011 14:47, glenn mcdonald wrote:
> This reminds me to come back to the point about what I initially
> called Directionality, and Dave improved to Modeling Consistency.
> ...
> - But even in RDF, directionality poses a significant discovery
>
Hi,
On 27 April 2011 11:18, Alexander Dutton wrote:
> On 17/04/11 21:07, Hugh Glaser wrote:
>>
>> As a consumer I would like to be able to distinguish a refusal to answer
>> from a failure of the web server to access the store, for example.
>
> In the general case, that was my concern, too. AFAIC
