Re: Recommendations for Documenting EoL.org Content Partners

2012-01-18 Thread Peter DeVries
Thanks all, I think that this would need to be changed to be a 303 redirect? foaf:page Also maybe we need a 666 redirect for lawers :-) - Pete On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Bernard Vatant wrote: > Hi Peter > > What about

Re: Recommendations for Documenting EoL.org Content Partners

2012-01-18 Thread Gannon Dick
Hi Pete, I'd use Dublin Core and RDFa in HTML for the Content Partners, but I'd suggest you look into the eGov IG activity on data base licenses.  You have, I think, concerns there too.  I don't mean to be flippant, but say Dr. Frankenstein is a Content Partner, then the lawyers will want to kn

Re: Recommendations for Documenting EoL.org Content Partners

2012-01-18 Thread Bernard Vatant
Hi Peter What about something like : rdf:type < http://www.w3.org/ns/org#OrganizationalCollaboration> < http://eol.org/partner/159> foaf:page

Recommendations for Documenting EoL.org Content Partners

2012-01-18 Thread Peter DeVries
Hi All, If you were to recommend how to markup the content providers listed on this page how would you do it? http://eol.org/content_partners Would you use SIOC, DOAP or some other vocabulary? What some would like is the ability to cite a content partner using just a URI. For example: I wou

Re: status and problems on sematicweb.org

2012-01-18 Thread Martin Hepp
Hi Dieter: > Small? The community around big data is exponentially growing. I meant that the number of people contributing serious content to the semanticweb.org wiki is still fairly small. I dont think that more than 50 people world-wide account for 98% of the non-malicious edits over the past

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] SOPA, Wikipedia, and dbpedia

2012-01-18 Thread Bryan Burgers
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 1/17/12 10:01 AM, Jörn Hees wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On 17. Jan. 2012, at 15:08, Kingsley Idehen wrote: >>> >>> On 1/17/12 8:39 AM, Mischa Tuffield wrote: Following on from the news that the English Wikipedia is going dark in >>>

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] SOPA, Wikipedia, and dbpedia

2012-01-18 Thread Bryan Burgers
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 1/17/12 10:38 AM, Bryan Burgers wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Kingsley Idehen >>  wrote: >>> >>> On 1/17/12 10:01 AM, Jörn Hees wrote: Hi, On 17. Jan. 2012, at 15:08, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > >

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] SOPA Blackout Vote

2012-01-18 Thread Melvin Carvalho
On 18 January 2012 12:01, Mischa Tuffield wrote: > How exciting ... Thanks everyone for voting. We received 100 votes in under a day. +82 yes +11 No +7 No Opinion Some notes for those interested: The app used for voting used 100% (semantic) web standards and was a pure html/js application, ta

Re: SOPA Blackout Vote

2012-01-18 Thread Jens Lehmann
Hello, On 18.01.2012 00:17, Patrick van Kleef wrote: > > Attached is the page OpenLink is considering to use on the sites it > controls including: > > * http://dbpedia.org > * http://dbpedia-live.openlinksw.com > * http://lod.openlinksw.com > * http://pingthesemanticweb.com > * http://uriburner

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] SOPA Blackout Vote

2012-01-18 Thread Mischa Tuffield
How exciting ... Mischa _ Mischa Tuffield PhD http://mmt.me.uk/ http://mmt.me.uk/foaf.rdf#mischa On 18 Jan 2012, at 03:07, David Wood wrote: > Hi all, > > 3 Round Stones supports the blackout. Our Web site will also be joining the > general strike tomorrow. > >