Excerpts from Luca Matteis's message of 2013-06-24 21:29:14 +:
> Exactly. And for me Linked Data is defined by those set of implementation
> details (HTTP, RDF, URIs and SPARQL).
>
> The only difference between my understanding and yours is that you think
> that you can still produce valid Lin
Dear Bernard,
As I may not be hard to guess, www.cidoc-crm.org is the home of CIDOC
CRM, and the source of ISO21127. I am chair of CIDOC CRM-SIG, a working
group of the International Committee for Documentation of the
International Council of Museums (ICOM), so I am the right address for
your
The Linked Data Glossary mentions Meta Data Object Schemes (MODS), a Library of
Congress (LOC) citation scheme. As you know, Bernadette, I (heart) Linked Data
to death, and (user) annotations are a great idea. Still for Government Policy,
annotations as Crowd Sourced Opinion, Easter Eggs, Spons
Hi Ghis,
The Community Directory has transitioned to the the Open Data Directory CG of
which you're a member :-). Some of the same people who support the the
Directory also contributed on the glossary development. We can incorporate new
features as the CG has the time & resources to commit. Let
Hi Melvin,
Thanks. May I ask you to provide definitions for each of the proposed terms
please? TIA. I believe we'll be able to update assuming the GLD WG extension
is approved.
Cheers,
Bernadette
On Jun 27, 2013, at 2:31 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>
>
>
> On 27 June 2013 17:08, Bernadet
Hi Ghis,
Now that the glossary is published, we're considering publishing through
OpenDataDir CG as LOD. Will reach out to this list when the planning phase
happens, already some great suggestions from various people on how to keep this
current & useful. Agree with your recommendations :-)
C
Hi Paolo,
Oh like that idea of annotations a lot! I don't want to get ahead of myself
here but assuming the Open Data Directory CG is happy to publish the glossary
as LOD from the w3.org namespace, we can readily incorporate a new feature
supporting the open annotations spec as nanopublications
Hi Bernard,
Yes, the GLD WG discussed but at the time we said we wanted to prioritize
getting the HTML version out before our charter ended. Now that it done, it
is easy to produce a version as LOD using SKOS. I'll suggest it to the newly
formed Open Data Directory Community Group as we can e
Bonjour, Hello,
The LIRMM (University of Montpellier & CNRS) and CISMeF (LITIS, & Rouen
School of Medicine) are currently offering 1 fully-funded PhD studentships
commencing fall 2013 for 3 years.
Applications are invited from France, EU and international students on the
following PhD project
*Apologies for cross-posting*
=== EXTENDED DEADLINE for Participation: CAMP-4-DATA Workshop in Lisbon ===
"CAMP-4-DATA WORKSHOP: Cyber-infrastructure & Metadata Protocols"
Dublin Core-Science and Metadata Community (DC-SAM) and Research Data
Alliance (RDA) are hosting a day-long Metadata Interes
Dear all,
> :my-list a co:List ;
> co:size "0"xsd:nonNegativeInteger .
Of course it should be
:my-list a co:List ;
co:size "0"^^xsd:nonNegativeInteger .
Have a nice day :-)
S.
Silvio Peroni, Ph.D.
D
Dear Michael,
> am I missing something or is there no way to close an empty list with the
> Collections Ontology ? That would be bad.
It is of course possible to make empty list using CO, since neither
co:firstItem nor co:lastItem are mandatory for the class co:List – i.e. co:List
is restricted
Apologies for multiple posting.
SMAM2013 - Last Call for Papers
First International Workshop on Semantic Music and Media (SMAM2013)
===
October 21st or 22nd, 2013, in Sydney, Australia. Collocated with the
12th International Semanti
hi all,
am I missing something or is there no way to close an empty list with the
Collections Ontology ? That would be bad.
Regards,
Michael Brunnbauer
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:34:58PM +0100, Dr David Shotton wrote:
> Dear Yusniel,
>
> We use the Collections Ontology ( http://purl.org/co )
14 matches
Mail list logo
