Apologies for cross-posting!
===
NLP & DBpedia Workshop 2013
===
Free, open, interoperable and multilingual NLP for DBpedia and DBpedia
for NLP:
http://nlp-dbpedia2013.blogs.aksw.org/
Collocated with the International Semantic Web Conference 2013 (ISWC 2
Hi,
At the UK Open Data Institute we've been working on some guidance and
a new vocabulary to help support the publication of machine-readable
rights statements for open data. The vocabulary builds on existing
work in this area (e.g. Dublin Core and Creative Commons) but
addresses a few issues tha
That's very interesting, thank you, Leigh.
I wonder whether you plan to consider work carried out in the framework of
the Open Data Rights Language (ODRL) CG of W3C [1].
Also, do you plan to support the notion of "licence type"? This is being
used, e.g., in vocabularies like ADMS.SW [2] and the D
Dear Leigh,
I am glad to see that in the last few months a critical mass of interest
for licensing Linked Data is being formed.
Besides a couple of analogous initiatives [1][2], the ODRL Community
Group [3] is expected to publish an advanced draft during this month of
July: the OWL version
Hi Andrea,
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Andrea Perego
wrote:
> That's very interesting, thank you, Leigh.
>
> I wonder whether you plan to consider work carried out in the framework of
> the Open Data Rights Language (ODRL) CG of W3C [1].
Yes, I'm aware of that work. ODRL is a general purpos
*** apologies for cross-posting ***
Dear colleagues,
as announced before, we had a new release of the RDF-representation of
bibliographic data in our Linked Data Service (LDS).
Please find now the English translation of the documentation under [1].
Questions, remarks and comments are welcome a
Leigh, this is *fantastic*; thanks for your contributions and bringing
ODRS to our attention!
I think something that could help with ODRS adoption is (are?) some
lightweight, community-sourced examples that demonstrate its use in
different (esp. legal) contexts.
John
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 4:23
hi all,
XML takes on many levels of machine readability. i would argue that if XML
came with an DTD/XML schema it is at least 3 star and possibly 4 star.
that at least was my experience with MAGE- ML (i'd say 3 star) and the
clinical XML for the TCGA project (4 star)
cheers,
michael
Mich
I agree Michael, but if you'll excuse the expression, I think we are arguing
semantics.
Datasets often have domain specific names for meta data components.
For example, Data Dot Gov has ~44 terms-of-art. They are to organizational
outsiders, tag soup, to organizational insiders they are a fl
Oops. http://www.rustprivacy.org/2013/egov/catalog/DataDotGovMetaTagSoup.html
should be MetaTagSoup
From: Gannon Dick
To: Michael Miller ; KANZAKI Masahide
; John Erickson
Cc: Bernadette Hyland ; W3C public GLD WG WG
; Linked Data community ; egov-ig
mai
10 matches
Mail list logo
