On 09/25/2013 04:31 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 25/09/13 15:10, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
On 09/25/2013 04:02 PM, Dave Reynolds wrote:
On 25/09/13 14:57, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
On 09/25/2013 03:53 PM, Dave Reynolds wrote:
Hi Damian,
On 25/09/13 14:16, Damian Steer wrote:
On 25/09/13 12:03, Stuar
On 25/09/13 15:10, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
On 09/25/2013 04:02 PM, Dave Reynolds wrote:
On 25/09/13 14:57, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
On 09/25/2013 03:53 PM, Dave Reynolds wrote:
Hi Damian,
On 25/09/13 14:16, Damian Steer wrote:
On 25/09/13 12:03, Stuart Williams wrote:
On 25/09/2013 11:26, Hugh G
The where clauses for CONSTRUCT are not restricted.
CONSTRUCT WHERE {} is a shorthand for CONSTRUCT {} WHERE {} and the first
of those two patterns is restricted. It has to be because the target graph
is created from that pattern by substitution, not any evaluation.
Barry
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 a
On 09/25/2013 04:02 PM, Dave Reynolds wrote:
On 25/09/13 14:57, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
On 09/25/2013 03:53 PM, Dave Reynolds wrote:
Hi Damian,
On 25/09/13 14:16, Damian Steer wrote:
On 25/09/13 12:03, Stuart Williams wrote:
On 25/09/2013 11:26, Hugh Glaser wrote:
You'll get me using CONSTRUCT
On 25/09/13 14:57, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
On 09/25/2013 03:53 PM, Dave Reynolds wrote:
Hi Damian,
On 25/09/13 14:16, Damian Steer wrote:
On 25/09/13 12:03, Stuart Williams wrote:
On 25/09/2013 11:26, Hugh Glaser wrote:
You'll get me using CONSTRUCT soon :-)
(By the way, Tim's actual CONSTRUCT
On 09/25/2013 03:53 PM, Dave Reynolds wrote:
Hi Damian,
On 25/09/13 14:16, Damian Steer wrote:
On 25/09/13 12:03, Stuart Williams wrote:
On 25/09/2013 11:26, Hugh Glaser wrote:
You'll get me using CONSTRUCT soon :-)
(By the way, Tim's actual CONSTRUCT WHERE query isn't allowed because
of the
Hi Damian,
On 25/09/13 14:16, Damian Steer wrote:
On 25/09/13 12:03, Stuart Williams wrote:
On 25/09/2013 11:26, Hugh Glaser wrote:
You'll get me using CONSTRUCT soon :-)
(By the way, Tim's actual CONSTRUCT WHERE query isn't allowed because
of the FILTER).
Good catch... yes - I've been bitte
On 25/09/13 12:03, Stuart Williams wrote:
> On 25/09/2013 11:26, Hugh Glaser wrote:
>> You'll get me using CONSTRUCT soon :-)
>> (By the way, Tim's actual CONSTRUCT WHERE query isn't allowed because
>> of the FILTER).
>
> Good catch... yes - I've been bitten by that kind of thing too... that
> not
On 25/09/2013 11:26, Hugh Glaser wrote:
You'll get me using CONSTRUCT soon :-)
(By the way, Tim's actual CONSTRUCT WHERE query isn't allowed because of the
FILTER).
Good catch... yes - I've been bitten by that kind of thing too... that not all
that's admissible in a WHERE 'body', is admissibl
You'll get me using CONSTRUCT soon :-)
(By the way, Tim's actual CONSTRUCT WHERE query isn't allowed because of the
FILTER).
In the end, I just wrote a little service to process the XML into turtle, so I
do want I want now.
The problem is that the only result format I can rely on an endpoint giv
On 25/09/2013 00:23, Tim Harsch wrote:
That idea seems very similar to the "DELETE WHERE" already in SPARQL 1.1, so
maybe to be consistent with that existing syntax it should be "CONSTRUCT WHERE"
Hmmm... something like:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-sparql11-query-20130321/#constructWh
11 matches
Mail list logo
