On 11 Feb 2014, at 01:53, Niklas Lindström wrote:
> I would say that the vcard ontology formally needs to be fixed to allow for
> more variation. It actually seems to have been amended somewhat in 2010 [4],
> to at least not require the exact second (or fraction thereof) of the birth.
The la
(Apologies for multiple postings)
SEKE 2014 Call For Papers
The 26th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge
Engineering
www.ksi.edu/seke/seke14.html
(Alternate website: www.cs.pitt.edu/~chang/seke/seke14.html)
Hyatt Regency, Vancouver, Canada
July 1 - July 3, 2014
Call
It may be worth reminding ourselves (?) that in RDF you can use “all of the
above”.
That is, if you want to make your RDF as consumable as possible, you may well
represent the same stuff using more than one ontology.
This is true of lots of things, such as peoples’ names or different
bibliograph
Hi Heiko,
Unless you want to use another ontology (e.g. BIO [1][2] or
schema.org[3]), I'd probably go ahead and break that contract,
although it is not
technically safe (AFAIK, it's a violation of OWL semantics). It depends on
the expected consumption of your data.
I would say that the vcard onto
TITLE: Open Position for Graduate Fellowship in Semantic Web Technologies at
CNR-STLAB
Important notice: send by February 19th to st...@cnr.it your CV, a motivational
statement, and the contact of at least one referee (or a recommendation
letter).
The official procedure for being admitted to t
Hi Heiko,
On 10 Feb 2014, at 15:55, Heiko Paulheim
wrote:
> Hi Jerven,
>
> this looks like a pragmatic solution. But I wonder if it may lead to any
> conflicts, e.g., the vcard ontology defines the bday property with
> xsd:dateTime as its range explicitly. Is it "safe" to simply use an xsd:gY
Hi Heiko,
The Timex3 standard for temporal expressions [1], as widely used for
linguistic analysis, suggests 'XX' if the date or month is unknown. I'm
not aware if people are using that to encode temporal expressions in
Linked datasets, but it would definitely be a better solution than using
Heiko,
Another solution (that may be overkill for your needs) is to use the Time
ontology[1]
rhw
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/
On 2014-02-10, at 10:37 AM, Heiko Paulheim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> xsd:dateTime and xsd:date are used frequently for encoding dates in RDF,
> e.g., for birthdays in
** apologies for cross-posting **
Second Call for Challenge: Concept-Level Sentiment Analysis
Challenge Website: http://challenges.2014.eswc-conferences.org/SemSA
Call Web page: http://2014.eswc-conferences.org/important-dates/call-SemSA
11th Extended Semantic Web Conference (ESWC) 2014
Hi Jerven,
this looks like a pragmatic solution. But I wonder if it may lead to any
conflicts, e.g., the vcard ontology defines the bday property with
xsd:dateTime as its range explicitly. Is it "safe" to simply use an
xsd:gYear value as its object?
Best,
Heiko
Am 10.02.2014 15:43, schrie
Hi Heiko,
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#gYear and
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#gYeargYearMonth
are the datatypes that you should use.
Regards,
Jerven
On 10 Feb 2014, at 15:37, Heiko Paulheim
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> xsd:dateTime and xsd:date are used frequently for encoding dates in RD
Hi all,
xsd:dateTime and xsd:date are used frequently for encoding dates in RDF,
e.g., for birthdays in the vcard ontology [1]. Is there any best
practice to encode incomplete date information, e.g., if only the birth
*year* of a person is known?
As far as I can see, the XSD spec enforces th
We apologize for cross-postings. Please circulate this CFP among your
colleagues and students.
REMINDER CALL FOR PAPERS
1st Cuban Workshop on Semantic Web (TCWS 2014)
Ha
** apologies for cross-posting **
Second Call for Challenge: Semantic Publishing
Challenge Website: http://challenges.2014.eswc-conferences.org/SemPub
Call Web page: http://2014.eswc-conferences.org/important-dates/call-SemPub
** NEWS:
** an open in-use task has been added!
11th
** apologies for cross-posting **
Second Call for Challenge: Linked Open Data-enabled Recommender Systems
Challenge Website: http://challenges.2014.eswc-conferences.org/RecSys
Call Web page: http://2014.eswc-conferences.org/important-dates/call-RecSys
11th Extended Semantic Web Confer
LiUD 2014 Workshop - Linking User Data
Held at UMAP 2014 - 22nd Conf. User Modeling, Adapation and Personalization
7-11 July 2014 - Aalborg, Denmark
Submission deadline: 1 April 2014
http://liud.linkededucation.org/
LINKING USER DATA
The use of external, open resources is becoming increasingly
16 matches
Mail list logo