On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Pat Hayes wrote:
>
> On Dec 4, 2009, at 11:14 AM, Bob Morris wrote:
>
>>> In any civilized ontology language, a class is an instance. Use OWL 2
>>> from
>>> now on.
>>> Pat
>>
>> Ah, a nice idea, but I dou
See
> http://rdf.taxonconcept.org/ses/v6n7p and http://rdf.taxonconcept.org/ses/Hq5OE
> and from there get the related owl documents. The owl documents should
> provide some information that will allow you to determine
> which concept is the best match for the captured specimen.
> A
ppy to have it explained why that understanding is wrong,
especially by a simple example that the Manchester OWL2 validator
agrees is OWL2 DL (or even better, OWL2 RL)
Bob Morris
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Pat Hayes wrote:
>
> On Dec 1, 2009, at 9:14 PM, Peter DeVries wrote:
>
> H
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Peter DeVries wrote:
> Hi LOD'ers,
>[...]
> I was thinking that the species itself should be a class so that individuals
> of that species would be instances of that class.
> Probably another skos:Concept class.
> So an individual species concept class like that for
