On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Deus, Helena wrote:
> I will forward you concerns to the provenance workgroup.
Well, authorization is going to be a big thing in our EU project...
various reasons for that, social, contractual, political. That's just
the way it is. I can elaborate further on our n
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Deus, Helena wrote:
> For those of you who haven’t answered and would like to give your 2c about
> how provenance should be dealt with on the semantic web, here’s your chance!
Authorization would probably not be considered provenance, but I was
wondering if the WG
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> On 5/6/11 7:53 AM, Egon Willighagen wrote:
>> A very simple approach is to use standard web software, which everyone
>> has installed already: a normal webbrowser, a normal webserver,
>> RDF/XML, and XSLT.
>
>
Dear Frans,
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Frans Knibbe wrote:
> I notice that it would be really helpful if I could automatically generate
> HTML files based on the RDF files. That way I can focus on just keeping the
> RDF file in good shape. After creating or editing an RDF file I could run
>
Hi Christopher,
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Christopher Gutteridge
wrote:
> "Is that bad? For Linked Data to be useful, you need to be able to mix and
> share.". Sorry but that's simply not true. For it to be useful *to you*,
> perhaps, but (Closed) Linked Data still has massive value as a t
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Martin Hepp
wrote:
>> ★ Available on the web (whatever format), but with an open licence
>
> I fear that the "open" requirement as the entrance gate for the star schema
> means that e-commerce data will be excluded.
>
> Most providers of e-commerce data (offer
Hi Bernard,
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Bernard Vatant
wrote:
> VOAF is of course a clear homage to FOAF, which is the hub of the network :
> more than half of the listed vocabularies rely on it one way or another.
> I've asked Dan Brickley a couple of days ago if he did not mind this
> frie
Hi Kingsley,
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> Seen this mail kinda late, hence late response. Some examples:
No worries!
> Links:
>
> 1. http://goo.gl/MG5iS -- shows a descriptor page, , and "Link"
> headers putting wdrs:describedBy to use
> 2.
> http://linkeddata.uribur
Hi Kingsley,
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 1:58 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> As a best practice, common use of these predicates would increase
> navigability, link density, and overall cohesiveness of the burgeoning Web
> of Linked Data. It would truly demonstrate practicing what we preach,
> dog-food s
2010/9/24 François Dongier :
> Would be nice to go a bit beyond this relatively crude categorisation.
> Enabling someone interested in, say, wine or Alabama farming, to highlight
> the datasets that are relevant to this interest.
Indeed, it would be great to select the classification ontology by
w
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> On 22 Sep 2010, at 20:41, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> If you want to see ChEMBL in the next issue, better get started on those
> links ;-)
I am on the road right now, but there is low hanging fruit... however,
at the same time,
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Anja Jentzsch wrote:
> 215 data sets have been entered into CKAN and added to the lodcloud group.
> 203 of those form a connected cloud of data sets, and are shown in the
> picture. The data sets consist of over 25 billion RDF triples, which are
> interlinked by
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Hondros, Constantine
wrote:
> My only suggestion is that you try to detect whether the page contains
> deliberate RDFa, for example whether it uses the RDFa DTD, or contains
> version="XHTML+RDFa 1.x", and don’t report any triples if it doesn’t
> conform. Otherwis
Hi Kei,
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Kei Cheung wrote:
> As part of the biordf query federation task, we are currently exploring a
> federation scenario involving integration of neuroreceptor-related
> information. For example, IUPHAR provides information for different classes
> of receptors.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Peter Ansell wrote:
> 2009/3/22 Egon Willighagen :
>> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 1:42 AM, Peter Ansell wrote:
>>> Do you also provide InChIKey resolution?
>>
>> No. That requires look up, so only works against an existing database.
&g
Hi Peter,
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 1:42 AM, Peter Ansell wrote:
> owl:sameAs fits well for that purpose.
>
>> http://rdf.openmolecules.net/?InChI=1/C12H8O2S/c13-8-5-6-10-11(12(8)14)7-3-1-2-4-9(7)15-10/h1-6,13-14H
>>
>> Linking back to rdf.openmolecules.net can be done as shown above with the
>> I
Hi Peter,
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Peter Ansell wrote:
> * Some http://database.bio2rdf.org/database:identifier URI's are given
> by this, but these aren't standard, and are only shown where there is
> still at least one SPARQL endpoint available which uses them. People
> should utilise t
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Georgi Kobilarov
wrote:
> Try the terms "Shakespeare", "EU", or "Cambridge" and see for yourself
> if the results you'd expect show up at the top. The result ranking is
> different - and supposed to be more useful - than a simple full-text
> search or SPARQL-Query
18 matches
Mail list logo
