Re: RDF Update Feeds + URI time travel on HTTP-level

2009-11-26 Thread Erik Hetzner
if what the user can bookmark and see is the conneg’ed URI (R') My belief (see [2] and especially [3]) is that properly behaving clients should bookmark R, not R'. I think that this could be problematic for Memento because the X-Accept-DateTime header could be lost with the bookmarking, as I mentioned in my previous message. But I think I may be beating a dead horse, because obviously clients in the real world behave by bookmarking and displaying R', not R. best, Erik Hetzner 1. <http://www.clinecenter.uiuc.edu/airbrushing_history/> 2. <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html> 3. <http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/UserAgent.html> pgp8GS8cSDh8N.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: RDF Update Feeds + URI time travel on HTTP-level

2009-11-24 Thread Erik Hetzner
Hi - At Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:02:37 -0700, Herbert Van de Sompel wrote: > > On Nov 23, 2009, at 4:59 PM, Erik Hetzner wrote: > > I think this is a very compelling argument. > > Actually, I don't think it is. The issue was also brought up (in a > significantly more

Re: RDF Update Feeds + URI time travel on HTTP-level

2009-11-23 Thread Erik Hetzner
At Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:14:01 +1000, Peter Ansell wrote: > 2009/11/24 Erik Hetzner : > […] > > On the other hand, there is, nothing I can see that prevents one URI > > from representing another URI as it changes through time. This is > > already the case with, e.g., > &g

Re: RDF Update Feeds + URI time travel on HTTP-level

2009-11-23 Thread Erik Hetzner
us in the web archiving community [1] would very much appreciate a serious look by the web architecture community into the problem of web archiving. The problem of representing and resolving the tuple is a question which has not yet been adequately dealt with. best, Erik Hetzner 1. Those unfamiliar