RE: [foaf-dev] EON - event of note

2010-11-07 Thread Michael Schneider
patialThing > >Probably need an attendee property and an organizer/participant >property. Maybe eon:cost, eon:details, eon:bookings. > >I've placed a sketch on my data wiki <http://wiki.ontologi.es/>. Feel >free to edit; and add yourself as a foaf:maker if you do!

RE: PUBLINK Linked Data Consultancy

2010-10-07 Thread Michael Schneider
Just my 2 Euro Cents. Michael -- Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider Research Scientist, Information Process Engineering (IPE) Tel : +49-721-9654-726 Fax : +49-721-9654-727 Email: michael.schnei...@fzi.de WWW : http://www.fzi.de/michael.sch

RE: FOAF DL

2010-07-24 Thread Michael Schneider
gt;-- >Antoine Zimmermann >Post-doctoral researcher at: >Digital Enterprise Research Institute >National University of Ireland, Galway >IDA Business Park >Lower Dangan >Galway, Ireland >antoine.zimmerm...@deri.org >http://vmgal34.deri.ie/~antzim/ -- D

RE: RDF Extensibility

2010-07-13 Thread Michael Schneider
>-Original Message- >From: semantic-web-requ...@w3.org [mailto:semantic-web-requ...@w3.org] >On Behalf Of Ian Davis >Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 5:53 PM >To: Dan Brickley >Cc: Jiří Procházka; Toby Inkster; Michael Schneider; Linked Data >community; Semantic Web; P

RE: Subjects as Literals

2010-07-06 Thread Michael Schneider
F Abstract Syntax. So they are not supported by RDF. >Best & TIA, > >Nathan Best, Michael [1] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-concepts-20040210/> [2] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-mt-20040210/> [3] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-syntax-grammar-20040

RE: Subjects as Literals

2010-07-06 Thread Michael Schneider
acopo Urbani, Spyros Kotoulas, Jason Maassen, Frank van Harmelen, >and Henri Bal. "OWL reasoning with WebPIE: calculating the closure of >100 billion triples" in the proceedings of ESWC 2010. > > > >Regards, >AZ. >-- >Antoine Zimmermann >Post-doctoral researcher a

RE: RDF Extensibility

2010-07-06 Thread Michael Schneider
. Interestingly, the idea of using the same name for both a class and a property is somewhat that has been introduced in OWL DL just in OWL 2, so it exists in OWL DL for less than a year now (officially). In RDFS and (therefore) in OWL Full, it has always been allowed, though. >cheers, >

RE: Subjects as Literals

2010-07-06 Thread Michael Schneider
Toby Inkster wrote: >On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 14:03:19 +0200 >"Michael Schneider" wrote: > >> So, if >> >> :s "lit" :o . >> >> must not have a semantic meaning, what about >> >> "lit" rdf:type rdf:Property . >

RE: Subjects as Literals

2010-07-06 Thread Michael Schneider
literals in all positions of a triple. [1] <http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-rdf-based-semantics/#topic-ont-generalrdf> -- Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider Research Scientist, Information Process Engineering (IPE) Tel : +49-721-9654-726 Fax : +49-721-9654-727 Email: michael.schnei...@fzi.de

RE: Subjects as Literals, [was Re: The Ordered List Ontology]

2010-07-04 Thread Michael Schneider
ead as: if a new serialization/syntax was defined for RDF what are the >limitations for the values of node/object and relationship specified by >the RDF Semantics? > >Best, > >Nathan > >ps: apologies if this is a dumb question, I fear i'd still be hear next >year try

RE: Show me the money - (was Subjects as Literals)

2010-07-04 Thread Michael Schneider
e. For other RDF tools, you are just asserting that there is some resource with two properties, but the values of these two properties are in no way related to each other -- quite in contrast to the original triple. So this should certainly not be suggested as "best practice" in an RDF co

RE: Subjects as Literals, [was Re: The Ordered List Ontology]

2010-07-02 Thread Michael Schneider
. A semantic interpretation function can then use the "S" to denote (to "name") the "O". But there is no a-priory connection between the two: any "S-P-O" triple can be interpreted by any "O-R-O" relationship. I think, the main confusion comes from th

RE: Show me the money - (was Subjects as Literals)

2010-07-02 Thread Michael Schneider
made into an open-source/free-software library to be used by everyone who needs it. And, why shouldn't this library not be created by the RDF2 working group itself? So, the "investment-killer" argument should not be a major one, at least... Michael -- Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider Re

RE: Subjects as Literals, [was Re: The Ordered List Ontology]

2010-07-02 Thread Michael Schneider
all these "MAY"s and similar statements. Michael -- Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider Research Scientist, Information Process Engineering (IPE) Tel : +49-721-9654-726 Fax : +49-721-9654-727 Email: michael.schnei...@fzi.de WWW : http://www.fzi.de/michael.schneider

RE: Subjects as Literals, [was Re: The Ordered List Ontology]

2010-07-01 Thread Michael Schneider
not well-defined. Michael [1] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-owl2-syntax-20091027> [2] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-owl2-mapping-to-rdf-20091027/> -- Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider Research Scientist, Information Process Engineering (IPE) Tel : +49-721-9654-726 Fax :

RE: Subjects as Literals, [was Re: The Ordered List Ontology]

2010-07-01 Thread Michael Schneider
>it. I guess, the Description Logic police will be very alerted, if you start creating inverses of properties that allow strings in object position. :-) (That's only supported by OWL Full.) Michael -- Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider Research Scientist, Information Process Engineering (IPE) T

RE: Subjects as Literals, [was Re: The Ordered List Ontology]

2010-06-30 Thread Michael Schneider
different semantic layer. So I would consider it redundant in RDF. Michael [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-owl2-direct-semantics-20091027/#Interpretation s [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-owl2-syntax-20091027/#Individual_Equality [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/#DefSemanticExtension -- Dipl.

RE: 'owl:Class and rdfs:Class' vs. 'owl:Class or rdfs:Class'

2010-06-16 Thread Michael Schneider
other side, modern SPARQL engines, such as this one from the >Virtuoso Server [3], are able to handle transitivity - a feature, which >is very important re. ontologies (I think). > >Cheers, > >Bob > > >[1] http://www1.inf.tu-dresden.de/~s9736463/ontologies/FOAF_- >_20

RE: An idea I need help with, or told to stop wasting time on!

2010-06-07 Thread Michael Schneider
2009/REC-owl2-rdf-based-semantics-20091027/ [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-owl2-syntax-20091027/ [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-owl2-direct-semantics-20091027/ -- Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider Research Scientist, Information Process Engineering (IPE) T

RE: An idea I need help with, or told to stop wasting time on!

2010-06-07 Thread Michael Schneider
>-Original Message- >From: semantic-web-requ...@w3.org [mailto:semantic-web-requ...@w3.org] >On Behalf Of Nathan >Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2010 11:51 PM >To: Michael Schneider >Cc: Linked Data community; semantic-...@w3.org >Subject: Re: An idea I need help with, or told

RE: An idea I need help with, or told to stop wasting time on!

2010-06-06 Thread Michael Schneider
bject property, then literals are not allowed. Again, no problems with RDF(S) and OWL Full. Michael [1] http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/20100101.rdf -- Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider Research Scientist, Information Process Engineering (IPE) Tel : +49-721-9654-726 Fax : +49-721-9654-727 Email: michael

RE: backronym proposal: Universal Resource Linker

2010-04-18 Thread Michael Schneider
gt; >If 'URL' can be brought back from limbo as a credible technical term, >and rebranded around the concept of 'linkage', I think it'll go a long >way towards explaining what we're up to with RDF. > >Thoughts? > >Dan -- Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider R

RE: [semanticweb] ANN: DBpedia 3.5 released

2010-04-13 Thread Michael Schneider
es: http://dbpedia.org Works! http://barans-grandma.org Does not work! How many years experience do I need to be able to access your grandma's homepage? Michael -- Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider Research Scientist, Information Process Engineering (IPE) Tel : +49-721-9654-726 Fax :

RE: KIT releases 14 billion triples to the Linked Open Data cloud

2010-04-01 Thread Michael Schneider
And what an amount of new links this will bring to everyone of us!!! So, I am happily waiting for your publication, ready to follow your lead right after. Cheers, Michael -- Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider Research Scientist, Information Process Engineering (IPE) Tel : +49-721-96

RE: OWL and LOD

2009-05-12 Thread Michael Schneider
inferred data, the better.", without any requirement for completeness. And the server does not need to do the inferencing at query time, but can decide to do it nightly, or fill the inference graph incrementally by a low-priority thread. Cheers, Michael -- Dipl.-Inform. Michael S