On 19 February 2015 at 11:52, Michael Brunnbauer
wrote:
> an interesting aspect of such a system is the ordering of triples - even
> if you restrict editing to one subject. Either the order is predefined and
> the
> user will have to search for his new triple after doing an insert or the
> user
>
from "ORCID Outreach Meeting (May 21 & 22, 2014) report":
http://blogs.nd.edu/emorgan/2014/06/orcid/
the author of the article experimented w. ORCID RDF but found its data
insufficient and used other APIs to get additional data:
"
Unfortunately, the RDF output only included the merest of FOAF-bas
ORCID data dump from 2013 is available (though requires filling in a
form, not friendly for automated downloads):
http://support.orcid.org/knowledgebase/articles/223698-how-do-i-get-a-public-data-file-
It only has XML and JSON, though.
Uldis
On 17 June 2014 19:47, Yusniel Hidalgo Delgado wrote
ISNI identifiers can also be extracted from VIAF authority data,
although that's IDs only. Once ISNI data is released as RDF is there a
plan to add relevant owl:sameAs links to VIAF?
Uldis
On 17 June 2014 17:32, Laura Dawson wrote:
> Keep your eyes out for ISNI data being released as RDF. We¹re
> Thanks yet another time for your insightful comments. I will most
> probably go with the "FRBR-ish" approach then by giving my
> elements an ID, sans explicitly using FRBR terms…
The Europeana Data Model (EDM) goes to quite some lengths to distinguish
between similar-but-not-the-same representa
NKOS 2013)
- Linking and Contextualizing Publications and Datasets: Paving the
way towards Modern Scholarly Communication (LCPD 2013)
All Workshops will be held on 26/09.
* TUTORIALS *
- AM1: Linked Data for Digital Libraries by Uldis Bojars, Jodi
Schneider and Nuno Lopes
- AM2: From Preserving Data to Prese
eis wrote:
> Ouch! sorry about this then! #swig sounds perfect then :-)
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Uldis Bojars wrote:
>>
>> There is the SemWeb Interest Group channel:
>> http://chatlogs.planetrdf.com/swig/
>>
>> It is a good fit for Linked Data to
There is the SemWeb Interest Group channel:
http://chatlogs.planetrdf.com/swig/
It is a good fit for Linked Data topics.
Uldis
On 26 April 2013 17:40, Luca Matteis wrote:
> I tend to hang out on IRC a lot. I haven't found much info about a Linked
> Data IRC channel, so I registered one on Freen
A correction re SDoW 2011 deadline extension:
Paper abstracts must be submitted by the original deadline: August 15, 2011.
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Uldis Bojars wrote:
>
> --- NEW submission deadline: August 19
--- NEW submission deadline: August 19, 2011 ---
4th International Workshop on
Social Data on the Web (SDoW2011)
October 23, 2011
collocated with ISWC 20
If you have in mind social or emergent use cases for library linked
data, we would appreciate if you could contribute them to the Library
Linked Data XG (e.g., via public-...@w3.org mailing list).
Detailed information about the call below.
> ===
A good question.
Forwarding the conversation to Ontolog-Forum and SIOC-Dev lists as their
subscribers may also have interesting insights.
Simon Reinhardt wrote:
Hi,
It is becoming somewhat popular for large ontologies to be split into
a core ontology file and module ontology files (which im
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Uldis Bojars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While her work does not map 1:1 and is at a finer-grained level,
Sorry, I left out a part of the sentence. It should be: "... does not
map 1:1 to what is asked for here ..."
Uldis
[ http://captsolo.net/info/ ]
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Richard Cyganiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Specify the amount of data ( resources or triples ).
>> Individual and aggregates ( per type? )
>
>> Strength is in the numbers!
>
> I agree that a vocabulary for describing datasets would be a good thing. And
> keepin
14 matches
Mail list logo