RE: {Disarmed} Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?

2011-01-07 Thread Andy Powell
opher Gutteridge; Hugh Glaser Cc: Peter DeVries; Subject: RE: {Disarmed} Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF? I suspect you might already be in FRBR hell with your use of dcterms:hasPart (at least in the ca

RE: {Disarmed} Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?

2011-01-07 Thread Andy Powell
ge Sent: 06 January 2011 21:02 To: Hugh Glaser Cc: Peter DeVries; Subject: {Disarmed} Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF? But that's me making a reasonable guess and getting on with it. The EPrints d

{Disarmed} Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?

2011-01-06 Thread Christopher Gutteridge
But that's me making a reasonable guess and getting on with it. The EPrints document is a URI which represents a conceptual document which consists of a number of actual files, eg. HTML+JPG+CSS, so the dct:hasPart makes sense there. The main issue is how to relate the document to the metadata