Hi Libby,
That's rather fabulous! Can you give some information about how often
this dataset is updated, and what's its geographical and product type
reach?
Thanks! This particular data set is a rather static collection and has a
bias towards US products. It will soon be complemented by a
Hi Steve,
as I replied to Libby (but did not include all mailing lists): The whole
data set is served from currently 100 smaller files, which will be
broken down to 1000 files shortly. For various reasons however, we don't
want to serve one file per element, because that will create a huge
Steve Harris wrote:
Very cool resource.
On 20 May 2009, at 10:18, Libby Miller wrote:
Individual commodity descriptions can be retrieved as follows:
http://openean.kaufkauf.net/id/EanUpc_UPC/EAN
Example:
http://openean.kaufkauf.net/id/EanUpc_0001067792600
This seems to give me
Hello!
Not very linked data friendly (you'll end up with a large proportion of
repeated triples in identical graphs, with different graph URIS), but
certainly better than nothing.
Just jumping on that - is that an issue? I would think not, as you may
want to repeat information across
Alternatively you could put that data in a RDF store, and just serve
up the fragments using a wrapped CONSTRUCT query.
That's what we do for qdos.com, eg
http://qdos.com/user/Steve-Harris/18b6f60b41e05aaa418565ebfe901d6b/rdfxml
and it's pretty efficient, more efficient that storing 1000
On 20 May 2009, at 15:48, Yves Raimond wrote:
Hello!
Not very linked data friendly (you'll end up with a large
proportion of
repeated triples in identical graphs, with different graph URIS), but
certainly better than nothing.
Just jumping on that - is that an issue? I would think not, as
Steve Harris wrote:
Alternatively you could put that data in a RDF store, and just serve
up the fragments using a wrapped CONSTRUCT query.
That's what we do for qdos.com, eg
http://qdos.com/user/Steve-Harris/18b6f60b41e05aaa418565ebfe901d6b/rdfxml
and it's pretty efficient, more efficient
Steve Harris wrote:
On 20 May 2009, at 16:38, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Steve Harris wrote:
Alternatively you could put that data in a RDF store, and just serve
up the fragments using a wrapped CONSTRUCT query.
That's what we do for qdos.com, eg
