Daniel Schwabe wrote:
On 02/03/2009 10:55, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
...
De-referencable URIs, Negotable Representation of Resource
Descriptions, and other elements of the Linked Data Web's FORCE as
are simply there to be tapped by current/next generation of
innovators on the Web and/or across
Dan Brickley wrote:
On 2/3/09 15:23, Daniel Schwabe wrote:
On 02/03/2009 10:55, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
...
De-referencable URIs, Negotable Representation of Resource
Descriptions, and other elements of the Linked Data Web's FORCE as are
simply there to be tapped by current/next generation of in
On 2/3/09 15:23, Daniel Schwabe wrote:
On 02/03/2009 10:55, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
...
De-referencable URIs, Negotable Representation of Resource
Descriptions, and other elements of the Linked Data Web's FORCE as are
simply there to be tapped by current/next generation of innovators on
the Web a
On 02/03/2009 10:55, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
...
De-referencable URIs, Negotable Representation of Resource
Descriptions, and other elements of the Linked Data Web's FORCE as are
simply there to be tapped by current/next generation of innovators onĀ
the Web and/or across the Enterprise en route
Matthias Samwald wrote:
Andraz:
That the bubbles continue to grown is however a sociological
interesting phenomen :-)
And a good sign that something has gone right :)
Giovanni:
Maybe :-) but people do things for many other reason that "they're
right".
I think the LOD project is a great suc
Andraz:
That the bubbles continue to grown is however a sociological
interesting phenomen :-)
And a good sign that something has gone right :)
Giovanni:
Maybe :-) but people do things for many other reason that "they're right".
I think the LOD project is a great success. It is a very lively