On 23 Apr 2013, at 22:39, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com
wrote:
On 4/23/13 5:04 PM, Hugh Glaser wrote:
Ah POWDER - of course.
It all comes together :-)
(Sorry if this is boring and obvious to others - and thanks Kingsley.)
So last (?!) 2 things, if I may.
Any proposal to attach
On 4/24/13 7:06 AM, Hugh Glaser wrote:
On 23 Apr 2013, at 22:39, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com
wrote:
On 4/23/13 5:04 PM, Hugh Glaser wrote:
Ah POWDER - of course.
It all comes together :-)
(Sorry if this is boring and obvious to others - and thanks Kingsley.)
So last (?!) 2
Hello Hugh,
if you have a representation, you could specify its MIME type with
dcterms:format and the http://purl.org/NET/mediatypes/ namespace.
Connecting the representation with the URL requires the URL to be described
with something like POWDER or uri4uri.net and some conneg property.
Hmmm.
So, taking a look at these three URLs, can you tell me
a) which of these support content negotiation, and b) what formats
they provide.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/fi4041004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.527932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1000/182
I tried vapor -- it seems to work by
The first two indicate that responses vary based on Accept header as
both have a Vary: Accept. The third doesn't so doesn't support
negotiation.
None of the URLs advertise what formats are available. That's not a
requirement for content-negotiation, although it'd be useful.
Cheers,
L.
On Wed,
Well, more than useful I think. Content negotiation without it seems a
bit pointless.
As you say, the last doesn't, the first two do, they overlap in formats
they will return, but each have some unique ones. But I had to read the
documentation to find this out. Bit clunky.
Phil
Leigh Dodds
On 22 Apr 2013, at 12:18, Phillip Lord phillip.l...@newcastle.ac.uk wrote:
snip
We need to check for content negotiation; I'm not clear, though, how we
are supposed to know what forms of content are available. Is there
anyway we can tell from your website that content negotiation is
possible?
On 4/23/13 1:42 PM, Hugh Glaser wrote:
We need to check for content negotiation; I'm not clear, though, how we
are supposed to know what forms of content are available. Is there
anyway we can tell from your website that content negotiation is
possible?
You can start with vapour [1], assuming you
Thanks Kingsley.
Yeah, Vapour is cool, but it doesn't address my question.
(Which actually seems to have got lost from your response.)
Best
On 23 Apr 2013, at 19:03, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
On 4/23/13 1:42 PM, Hugh Glaser wrote:
We need to check for content negotiation;
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
On 22 Apr 2013, at 12:18, Phillip Lord phillip.l...@newcastle.ac.uk wrote:
snip
We need to check for content negotiation; I'm not clear, though, how we
are supposed to know what forms of content are available. Is there
Ah of course - thanks Mark, silly me.
So I look at the Link: header for something like
curl -L -i http://dbpedia.org/resource/Luton
Which gives me the information I want.
Anyone got any offers for how I would use Linked Data to get this into my RDF
store?
So then I can do things something like:
On 4/23/13 2:49 PM, Mark Baker wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
On 22 Apr 2013, at 12:18, Phillip Lord phillip.l...@newcastle.ac.uk wrote:
snip
We need to check for content negotiation; I'm not clear, though, how we
are supposed to know what forms
On 4/23/13 3:39 PM, Hugh Glaser wrote:
Ah of course - thanks Mark, silly me.
So I look at the Link: header for something like
curl -L -i http://dbpedia.org/resource/Luton
Which gives me the information I want.
Anyone got any offers for how I would use Linked Data to get this into my RDF
store?
Ah, thanks for the Web101 course. :-)
Sorry, I usually live in a Linked Data world, so I don't think about html stuff
such as
link rel=alternate …
because (like the header) it doesn't appear in the RDF.
On 23 Apr 2013, at 20:54, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com
wrote:
On 4/23/13 3:39
On 4/23/13 4:23 PM, Hugh Glaser wrote:
Ah, thanks for the Web101 course.:-)
Sorry, I usually live in a Linked Data world, so I don't think about html stuff
such as
link rel=alternate …
because (like the header) it doesn't appear in the RDF.
On 23 Apr 2013, at 20:54, Kingsley
Ah POWDER - of course.
It all comes together :-)
(Sorry if this is boring and obvious to others - and thanks Kingsley.)
So last (?!) 2 things, if I may.
Any proposal to attach types to the objects of the wdrs:desribedby triples?
Any proposal so that I can infer the available types for the whole
On 4/23/13 5:04 PM, Hugh Glaser wrote:
Ah POWDER - of course.
It all comes together :-)
(Sorry if this is boring and obvious to others - and thanks Kingsley.)
So last (?!) 2 things, if I may.
Any proposal to attach types to the objects of the wdrs:desribedby triples?
So as in
17 matches
Mail list logo
