>
>
> > However, just to balance the picture slightly ...
> >
> > There are *some* clear, well documented examples of semweb/RDF/LD
> delivering business value through data integration. The most famous of
> these being probably: Garlik (now Experian), Amdocs and arguably the BBC.
> In my experience
Hey all,
speaking of (business) use cases for Linked Data, there is a number of
them on W3C site:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/sweo/public/UseCases/
However I needed to present a few cases as a minimal slide deck, so
here it is -- maybe it will be helpful to someone:
http://www.slideshare.net/graphi
Hi,
Thank you all for your observations on Semgel. I was really delighted to
see Sebastian taking it upon himself to articulate in some detail about how
Semgel aligns with the Linked Data vision. Much appreciated!
Its also been great to see some of the interesting thoughts and pointers
that have
In the past months i have worked a lot on the commercialization of RDF
basedknowledge technologies so i feel like giving a contribution.
We tried to understand what could be of interest to enterprise and
came up with the slogan - or lets say adopted - "enterprise linked
data clouds" with an inter
Hi Dave,
comments inline. :)
Am 20.07.2012 um 23:25 schrieb Dave Reynolds:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> I completely agree with what you say about:
> o Harish's original post being relevant to linked data and this list
> o that the culture of this forum can be counter productive
> o that the evidence
Dear Martynas,
Thanks for your constructive answer. I completely agree with all your points,
and I am looking forward to your software (already checked the README ;-) ). We
will surely try it out (maybe as a client for our Linked Media Framework).
The problem I am facing is that part of my (and
Sebastian, all,
I'm on your side here. But regarding Linked Data, consider the
following points that slow down its adoption:
- data-heavy players such as Facebook and Google might not be
interested in adopting a new open, even if superior, data approach,
since it is in their interest to keep as mu
Hi Sebastian,
I completely agree with what you say about:
o Harish's original post being relevant to linked data and this list
o that the culture of this forum can be counter productive
o that the evidence for linked data delivering business value needs
to be a lot stronger
However, ju
On 7/20/12 4:05 PM, Sebastian Schaffert wrote:
Kingsley,
Am 20.07.2012 um 20:20 schrieb Kingsley Idehen:
Again, how have you arrived at the Linked Data vs CSV scenario? Secondly, if
you'd done some background lookup, you would have stumbled across comments I've
made about CSV and Linked Data
Kingsley,
Am 20.07.2012 um 20:20 schrieb Kingsley Idehen:
> Again, how have you arrived at the Linked Data vs CSV scenario? Secondly, if
> you'd done some background lookup, you would have stumbled across comments
> I've made about CSV and Linked Data.
This is exactly the kind of comment by w
On 7/20/12 11:48 AM, Sebastian Schaffert wrote:
[SNIP] -- so that we can focus on the key non personal points.
My claim is founded in the many discussions I have when going to the CTOs
of*real* companies (big ones, outside the research business) out there and
trying to convince them that they
Kingsley,
I am trying to respond to your factual arguments inline. But let me first point
out that the central problem for me is exactly what Mike pointed out: "In your
enthusiasm and cheerleading you as often turn people off as inspire them. You
too frequently take it upon yourself to "speak f
On 7/20/12 10:17 AM, Mike Bergman wrote:
Hi Kingsley,
On 7/20/2012 5:30 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 7/19/12 9:13 PM, Mike Bergman wrote:
+1
On 7/19/2012 6:37 PM, glenn mcdonald wrote:
Remember, this is the Linked Open Data (LOD) forum. We've long
past
the issue of *demand driven*
On 7/20/12 4:06 AM, Sebastian Schaffert wrote:
Am 19.07.2012 um 20:50 schrieb Kingsley Idehen:
I completely understand and appreciate your desire (which I share) to see a
mature landscape with a range of linked data sources. I can also understand how
a database or spreadsheet can potentially
Hi Kingsley,
On 7/20/2012 5:30 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 7/19/12 9:13 PM, Mike Bergman wrote:
+1
On 7/19/2012 6:37 PM, glenn mcdonald wrote:
Remember, this is the Linked Open Data (LOD) forum. We've long past
the issue of *demand driven* over here, re. Linked Data.
There's a di
On 7/19/12 9:13 PM, Mike Bergman wrote:
+1
On 7/19/2012 6:37 PM, glenn mcdonald wrote:
Remember, this is the Linked Open Data (LOD) forum. We've long past
the issue of *demand driven* over here, re. Linked Data.
There's a difference between solving an issue and just refusing to
addre
On 7/19/12 8:37 PM, glenn mcdonald wrote:
Remember, this is the Linked Open Data (LOD) forum. We've long
past the issue of *demand driven* over here, re. Linked Data.
There's a difference between solving an issue and just refusing to
address it any more. Pity there isn't a another for
Hello Sebastian,
I agree 100%
Regards,
Michael Brunnbauer
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:06:38AM +0200, Sebastian Schaffert wrote:
> But I agree. A technology that is not able to fire proof its usefulness in a
> demand driven / problem driven environment is maybe interesting from an
> academic s
Am 19.07.2012 um 20:50 schrieb Kingsley Idehen:
>>
>> I completely understand and appreciate your desire (which I share) to see a
>> mature landscape with a range of linked data sources. I can also understand
>> how a database or spreadsheet can potentially offer fine-grained data access
>> -
+1
On 7/19/2012 6:37 PM, glenn mcdonald wrote:
Remember, this is the Linked Open Data (LOD) forum. We've long past
the issue of *demand driven* over here, re. Linked Data.
There's a difference between solving an issue and just refusing to
address it any more. Pity there isn't a anothe
>
> Remember, this is the Linked Open Data (LOD) forum. We've long past the
> issue of *demand driven* over here, re. Linked Data.
>
There's a difference between solving an issue and just refusing to address
it any more. Pity there isn't a another forum for generating actual demand
as reliably as
On 7/19/12 2:08 PM, Harish Kumar M. wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Kingsley Idehen
mailto:kide...@openlinksw.com>> wrote:
On 7/19/12 10:58 AM, Harish Kumar M. wrote:
Thanks Kingsley!
Just to clarify
- Our current focus is on allowing users to *consume* data.
Let
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> On 7/19/12 9:18 AM, Harish Kumar M. wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to introduce Semgel (http://semgel.com), an web app that we
> are building for gathering and analyzing data from websites. The
> application is based on semweb technologi
On 7/19/12 9:18 AM, Harish Kumar M. wrote:
Hi,
I would like to introduce Semgel (http://semgel.com), an web app that
we are building for gathering and analyzing data from websites. The
application is based on semweb technologies (rdf, owl, triple stores
etc) and as such might of interest to t
Hello again,
I noticed that a lot of you were not using "quick start" approach I had
mentioned in the earlier mail. By going to the link below, you don't need
to signup. Just
- go to the link http://semgel.com/data/segment/sg11100-product-search
- scroll down and click on *"Analyze Now" *to get st
Hi,
I would like to introduce Semgel (http://semgel.com), an web app that we
are building for gathering and analyzing data from websites. The
application is based on semweb technologies (rdf, owl, triple stores etc)
and as such might of interest to this group.
The core application is generic - it
26 matches
Mail list logo
