Hi Paul,
thanks a lot for your very insightful experience report about Semantic
Web, RDF and DBPedia.
(more thoughts inline)
Am 02.07.2010 17:07, schrieb Paul Houle:
Here are some of my thoughts
[skip]
(4) I'm one of the people who got interested in semantic tech because of
DBPedia,
Hello Paul,
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 11:07 -0400, Paul Houle wrote:
Here are some of my thoughts
(2) Yet, the big graph and triple paradigms run into big problems
when we try to build real systems. There are two paradigms I work
in: (i) storing 'facts' in a database, and (ii) processing
Here are some of my thoughts
(1) The global namespace in RDF plus the concept that most knowledge can be
efficiently represented with triples are brilliant; in the long term we're
going to see these two concepts diffuse into non-RDF systems because they
are so powerful. I appreciate the way
On 2 Jul 2010, at 17:07, Paul Houle wrote:
ow, if hardware cost was no object, I suppose I could keep triples in a
huge distributed main-memory database. Right now, I can't afford that.
(If I get richer and if hardware gets cheaper, I'll probably want to
handle more data, putting me
Paul, please keep these thoughts coming. I have a couple of followups,
inline below.
On Jul 2, 2010, at 10:07 AM, Paul Houle wrote:
Here are some of my thoughts
(1) The global namespace in RDF plus the concept that most
knowledge can be efficiently represented with triples are
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Henry Story henry.st...@gmail.com wrote:
So similarly with RDF stores. Is it not feasible that one may come up with
just in time
storage mechanisms, where the triple store could start analyising how the
data was used in
order then to optimise the layout of
