The problem is not as black and white as you paint it. The real problem with
the Internet is that legislators do not know how to legislate rights and
regulations to deal properly with civil and human rights and intellectual
property rights and the US based companies are the ones profiting the mo
IANAL but:
Surely all Google, or any US search engine, would need to do is close down
all local subsidiaries in states that are subject to the ECJ. EU member
states would be free to attempt to block all access to google (or to refer
the reasonableness of the preliminary ruling back to the ECJ; th
I agree with you on the right to be forgotten. Yet technically it would make
more sense to create special tagging which would upon request of the individual
and through an mediation process involving a national agency supervising
digital rights and privacy to have search engines provide a (legal
On Sat, 5/17/14, Michael Brunnbauer wrote:
> But there is a way out of the verdict and it involves
novel use of linked data and semantic web technologies.
I very much doubt that triples can help here.
=
I agree, Michael, but
Hello Milton,
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 05:41:49AM -0700, ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program wrote:
> My point of view is shared by most members of EDRI, the European Digital
> Rights platform.
The important word is "most" here. And you too seem to agree that a right to
be forgotten makes sense.
Many p
My point of view is shared by most members of EDRI, the European Digital Rights
platform. Google is forced to change everything including offensive content
from e.g. FaceBook!!! And because of the European legalese the verdict will
also apply generically to all other search engine companies.
An
hi all,
http://www.internet-law.de/2014/05/the-ecj-is-right-the-result-is-wrong.html
Regards,
Michael Brunnbauer
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 01:09:54PM -0700, ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program wrote:
> The European Union Court has reached a verdict with a profound impact on the
> functioning of the Int
Otherwise an Orwellian future looms at the horizon where history is
conveniently rewritten in cases where for freedom of information reasons
this obviously should NOT.
I know that this is not the most productive way to address your email
and start a discussion on an important topic; but, with a
" I think it is high time that the creators, maintainers and
developers of the platforms which collectively form the
Internet sit down with search engine companies and work out
some practical rules to provide the option of the right to
have some personal information forgotten, as stated in this
