On 1/21/11 12:25 PM, Raúl García Castro wrote:
El 21/01/11 15:54, Kingsley Idehen escribió:
On 1/21/11 9:40 AM, Raúl García Castro wrote:
Dear Bernard,
In the SemsorGrid4Env European project [4] we are working with the
SWEET v2.0 ontologies in order to reuse some general terms in our
flood man
El 21/01/11 15:54, Kingsley Idehen escribió:
On 1/21/11 9:40 AM, Raúl García Castro wrote:
Dear Bernard,
In the SemsorGrid4Env European project [4] we are working with the
SWEET v2.0 ontologies in order to reuse some general terms in our
flood management use case.
You are correct in saying tha
On 1/21/11 9:40 AM, Raúl García Castro wrote:
Dear Bernard,
In the SemsorGrid4Env European project [4] we are working with the
SWEET v2.0 ontologies in order to reuse some general terms in our
flood management use case.
You are correct in saying that the documentation and metadata provided
Dear Bernard,
In the SemsorGrid4Env European project [4] we are working with the SWEET
v2.0 ontologies in order to reuse some general terms in our flood
management use case.
You are correct in saying that the documentation and metadata provided
by these ontologies could be better. And this w
to address above issues
From: public-lod-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-lod-requ...@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Bernard Vatant
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 2:14 PM
To: Linking Open Data
Subject: SWEET (but not friendly) ontologies
Hello all
Gathering vocabularies for the growing VOAF dataset [1
Hello all
Gathering vocabularies for the growing VOAF dataset [1] leads to the
discovery of a bunch of linking and resusing good practice (good news) but
also makes obvious in comparison some data islands, apparently isolated from
everyything else whatsoever in the Cloud.
The SWEET ontologies dev
