Re: URLs in Data Working Draft

2013-07-12 Thread Kingsley Idehen
r *Cc:* David Booth; David Wood; Uche Ogbuji; Jeni Tennison; public-lod; www-...@w3.org List *Subject:* Re: URLs in Data Working Draft On 12 July 2013 17:03, Larry Masinter <mailto:masin...@adobe.com>> wrote: Re Angels and Pins: http://masinter.blogspot.com/2010/03/resources-are-ange

RE: URLs in Data Working Draft

2013-07-12 Thread Larry Masinter
elvincarva...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 8:34 AM To: Larry Masinter Cc: David Booth; David Wood; Uche Ogbuji; Jeni Tennison; public-lod; www-...@w3.org List Subject: Re: URLs in Data Working Draft On 12 July 2013 17:03, Larry Masinter mailto:masin...@adobe.com>> wrote: Re Angels

Re: URLs in Data Working Draft

2013-07-12 Thread Melvin Carvalho
On 12 July 2013 17:03, Larry Masinter wrote: > Re Angels and Pins: > > > http://masinter.blogspot.com/2010/03/resources-are-angels-urls-are-pins.html > > > Larry, thanks for sharing, I enjoyed reading that. Re: [[ is "http://larry.masinter.net"; an identifier for me or for my web page? ... a

RE: URLs in Data Working Draft

2013-07-12 Thread Larry Masinter
Re Angels and Pins: http://masinter.blogspot.com/2010/03/resources-are-angels-urls-are-pins.html

Re: URLs in Data Working Draft

2013-07-11 Thread David Booth
:) It is interesting how this characterization of the httpRange-14 debate as "angels on pinheads" so nicely parallels the exact point I have tried so hard and long to articulate about the ambiguity of a URI's resource identity: that ambiguity is *relative* to the beholder. To some, certain d

Re: URLs in Data Working Draft

2013-07-11 Thread Ashok Malhotra
Jeni: At the end of 4.3 where you mention Link Header, please add a reference to the Link Header RFC. I think a bit more discussion about the use of Link Header would be good but your call. All the best, Ashok On 7/11/2013 4:49 AM, Jeni Tennison wrote: Dear public-lod, RDF WG, Some of you will

Re: URLs in Data Working Draft

2013-07-11 Thread David Wood
Hi Uche, Yes, but David Booth will reply shortly. Over to you, David! Regards, Dave -- http://about.me/david_wood On Jul 11, 2013, at 16:28, Uche Ogbuji wrote: > > Amen! Amen! Amen! Hallelujah!. After over a decade of angels > dancing on pinheads, and coming dangerously close to reinventi

Re: URLs in Data Working Draft

2013-07-11 Thread Uche Ogbuji
Amen! Amen! Amen! Hallelujah!. After over a decade of angels dancing on pinheads, and coming dangerously close to reinventing the topic/occurrence dichotomy with httprange-14, we once again find ourselves back in the untidy but happy world of common sense. Well done TAG! On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 a

Re: URLs in Data Working Draft

2013-07-11 Thread David Wood
Thanks, Jeni. The RDF WG formally acknowledges this FPWD. Regards, Dave -- http://about.me/david_wood On Jul 11, 2013, at 04:49, Jeni Tennison wrote: > Dear public-lod, RDF WG, > > Some of you will have seen that the First Public Working Draft of "URLs in > Data" has been published by the

URLs in Data Working Draft

2013-07-11 Thread Jeni Tennison
Dear public-lod, RDF WG, Some of you will have seen that the First Public Working Draft of "URLs in Data" has been published by the TAG [1]. This document is the outcome of the call for change proposals [2] for the TAG's 2005 decision on httpRange-14 [3]. The document purposefully does not add