We discourage the use of large RDF/XML dump files in the context of
GoodRelations, since they are a perfect entry for Denial-of-Service attacks.
Also, properly deploying RDF/XML resources on production systems is often
difficult in an enterprise context. Even supporting the rdf/xml media type ca
Dear Martynas,
the parallel way has some disadvantages in a dynamic context, so I was
asking what the latest best practice was to embed RDF in HTML.
Having a companion or separate RDF file is definitely suitable for most
of the use cases, but not always (e.g. in the case of an annotation web
se
Hey Sebastian,
can't you simply use ?
It's not embedding per se, but it's one of the patterns. More info here:
http://linkeddatabook.com/editions/1.0/#htoc66 (section "Making RDF
Discoverable from HTML")
Martynas
graphity.org
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Sebastian Hellmann
wrote:
> Dear Ma
Hi all:
First, a few arguments in favor of using invisible data content in RDFa are in
[1]. Also note our two tools [2] and [3] that can generate RDFa snippets from
other RDF syntaxes with ease, so you can e.g. model your data structures in
nice Turtle and then derive the RDFa patterns automati
thML for people who do math, MODS for
people
who keep track of written stuff.
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.rustprivacy.org/FunForLibrarians.pdf">http://www.rustprivacy.org/FunForLibrarians.pdf</a>
____
From: John Erickson<olyerick...@gmail.co
Dear Mark,
my main concerns are:
1. What are the best practices to include invisible RDFa in an HTML
document. I think Keith answered that. Maybe at the end of the body
would be the most unobtrusive way. The same question was raised here:
http://answers.semanticweb.com/questions/10161/is-visua
Hi Sebastian,
It's not clear to me whether you are saying that you don't want to use
RDFa because:
* you don't like it, or;
* you think that it needs to have some user-oriented manifestation.
There is no requirement that the RDFa in a document is displayed to
the user in any way, or that the tr
DS for people
> who keep track of written stuff.
> http://www.rustprivacy.org/FunForLibrarians.pdf
>
>
>
> From: John Erickson
> To: Sebastian Hellmann
> Cc: public-lod ; semantic-web
> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 9:32 AM
> Subject: Re: be
rustprivacy.org/FunForLibrarians.pdf
From: John Erickson
To: Sebastian Hellmann
Cc: public-lod ; semantic-web
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 9:32 AM
Subject: Re: best practice RDF in HTML
Sebastian, is the requirement that the RDF not be *integrated* with
the
Sebastian,
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Sebastian Hellmann <
hellm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de> wrote:
> Dear list,
> What are the best practice to include a set of RDF triples in HTML.
> *Please note*: I am not looking for the RDFa way to include triples. I
> just want to add a set of tripl
Dear John,
I know that linking would be the clean solution, but sometimes this is
difficult.
The HTML gets send around by web services orchestrated by a CMS. It
would be difficult to create temporary links to include in the HTML,
e.g. you would have to set a time to life and do extra access
au
Sebastian, is the requirement that the RDF not be *integrated* with
the content of the page --- in other words, you just want to embed a
"dump" of some RDF?
Why not link to a RDF or TTL file?
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Sebastian Hellmann
wrote:
> Dear list,
> What are the best practice to
Dear list,
What are the best practice to include a set of RDF triples in HTML.
*Please note*: I am not looking for the RDFa way to include triples. I
just want to add a set of triples somewhere in an HTML document. They
are not supposed to show up like "Wikinomics", "Don Tapscott" in the
follo
13 matches
Mail list logo
