On 9 May 2009, at 20:49, Tim Berners-Lee wrote:
Maybe what could happen is a new version could be put in the same
place
with a revised Status Of This Document bit, which can be done by the
W3C staff, explaining the situation. The W3C staff is officially
responsible for the SOTD. If there
Martin,
On 7 May 2009, at 07:51, Martin Hepp (UniBW) wrote:
(Due to the masses of old vCard data, it would not be prudent for
any data-consuming application to accept only new vCard data
anyway - see my SWOOGLE figures from the initial mail - 230,000 vs.
470 datasets - which implies that
Dear all:
As far as I can see, there are now two vCard variants in use - the original
http://www.w3.org/2001/vcard-rdf/3.0#
and the new one
http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns#
Now - which one should data providers and application developers use? I
see the technical advantages of the new
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Martin Hepp (UniBW)
martin.h...@ebusiness-unibw.org wrote:
Dear all:
As far as I can see, there are now two vCard variants in use - the original
http://www.w3.org/2001/vcard-rdf/3.0#
and the new one
http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns#
In general, the new one
