On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 20:22 -0400, Ben Adida wrote:
> Dan,
>
> Thanks for the comments.
>
> >
> >
> > iCalendar doesn't allow 20060508T1000-0500 as a dtstart,
> > and neither does http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/ical .
>
> [...]
>
> >
> > 2002-06-30T09:00:00
> > /softwarestudio
Dan,
Thanks for the comments.
iCalendar doesn't allow 20060508T1000-0500 as a dtstart,
and neither does http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/ical .
[...]
2002-06-30T09:00:00
/softwarestudio.org/Olson_20011030_5/America/New_Yorktzid>
That's unfortunate, though I see why
On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 12:14 -0400, Ben Adida wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/HTML/2006-04-24-rdfa-primer
>
[...]
>
> 2) Section 2 is entirely rewritten, thanks to a very productive
> offline discussion with MarkB (and a suggestion due also to DanC). In
> part
Gary,
Thanks! It is much appreciated.
Here's the changelog as I described it to the Task Force:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Apr/0043
Note that I still need until Wednesday to make sure I've addressed
all of your previous comments, and I'll send a changelog
The [1]record of today's Task Force telecon is ready for review.
[1] http://www.w3.org/2006/04/24-htmltf-minutes
Topics:
1. Action Review
2. RDFa Primer Draft
3. meta and link referring only to parent
Summary of Resolutions
RESOLVED to ask the SWBPD WG to review this editor's draft
Fabien,
Ralph mentioned in today's WG telecon that you might be interested in
reviewing the latest RDFa Primer. Your comments would be extremely
helpful!
The latest draft will be ready at:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/HTML/2006-04-24-rdfa-primer
on Wednesday (in 2 days).
If you
Gary,
Your comments on the last RDFa draft were extremely helpful. Would
you be willing to do a review of our second draft?
It will be ready on Wednesday (in 48 hours), at
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/HTML/2006-04-24-rdfa-primer
Ideally, if your review could be done by May 8th,
> From: Ben Adida
> . . .
> Note that I have *not* addressed Alistair's comment that a XHTML
> fragment cannot also be a physical resource. Like Mark, Jeremy, and
> Pat, I believe an XHTML fragment *can* also be a camera or a person.
> I'm sure we'll face opposition on this problem, but thi
Steven,
Thanks for the comments on such short notice :)
On Apr 24, 2006, at 8:01 AM, Steven Pemberton wrote:
Some comments:
(It doesn't display in Opera, OK, that will be fixed).
Yes, sorry, I only uploaded the XML file.
[...]
4.3.
Did we really agree that meta and link only talk about
Looks good.
Some comments:
(It doesn't display in Opera, OK, that will be fixed).
Section 1:
It is not about embedding RDF syntax into XHTML documents. =>
It is not about embedding RDF/XML syntax into XHTML documents.
Examples: Several are too long to print in IE with defaul
Hi all,
As a little experiment I've created a Google Calendar entry for the TF. It
should show up in searches but doesn't seem to be doing so at the moment.
But if you use Google Calendar, or any iCal aware software then this should
give you the diary:
http://www.google.com/calendar/ical/[EMAI
11 matches
Mail list logo
