Re: TC#88: Interpretation of _: CURIE

2008-05-18 Thread Ivan Herman
'_:' is _a_ BNode. Ie: there _one_ BNode (within the RDF Graph generated for that HTML file, of course) that is identified by '_:'. This can be deduced from the wording of the CURIE specification (maybe a more explicit note would be welcome, though...) The alternative that was discussed was th

TC#88: Interpretation of _: CURIE

2008-05-18 Thread Manu Sporny
I can't find anything in either the RDFa Syntax Document or the CURIE Syntax spec that explicitly states what the proper interpretation of the _: CURIE should be... Can't seem to remember what we had settled on... just want to know if TC#88 is correct or not. Reading the RDFa Syntax Document lit

Re: 2 RDFa SPARQL Test Harness Issues

2008-05-18 Thread Manu Sporny
Seaborne, Andy wrote: >> We could remove it - but it's valid[1][2] UTF-8, isn't it? Technically, >> we should be able to feed that to SPARQL and the engine should deal with >> it, right? > > I am not an expert on Unicode - but not by my reading of the Unicode > - it's in the middle of the URL st

RDFa TC#11 SPARQL is incorrect

2008-05-18 Thread Manu Sporny
The current SPARQL for TC#11 is wrong, it is missing the Dublin Core namespace. Here is the corrected SPARQL: -- ASK WHERE {

RE: 2 RDFa SPARQL Test Harness Issues

2008-05-18 Thread Seaborne, Andy
> -Original Message- > From: Manu Sporny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 18 May 2008 17:11 > To: Seaborne, Andy > Cc: RDFa mailing list; Benjamin Nowack; Dave Beckett > Subject: Re: 2 RDFa SPARQL Test Harness Issues > > Seaborne, Andy wrote: > >> We currently have two test cases that us

Re: 2 RDFa SPARQL Test Harness Issues

2008-05-18 Thread Manu Sporny
Seaborne, Andy wrote: >> We currently have two test cases that use UTF-8 characters (TC#60 and >> TC#108). The SPARQL.org and ARC SPARQL engines both die processing >> queries containing multi-byte UTF-8 characters: >> > > It starts with "\ufeffASK", i.e. a BOM. > ... > Remove the BOM and the bo

Re: 2 RDFa SPARQL Test Harness Issues

2008-05-18 Thread Manu Sporny
Dave Beckett wrote: >> The question that we're attempting to ask above is "is there a bnode >> that has an rdf:type of foaf:Person?", not "is there any node that has >> an rdf:type of foaf:Person?". > > For that you want. > ASK WHERE { > ?a >