s the message
'here is a vocabulary from which I intend to use certain terms'.
Yes, this is what I meant in my post as well... make it something that
might be understood more easily by laymen. @vocab is an improvement, at
least for english speakers.
Regards-
-Doug Schepers
W3C Te
Hi, Ben-
Ben Adida wrote (on 7/20/09 12:59 AM):
Doug Schepers wrote:
Sorry to bikeshed about this so early, but please reconsider the name
for the attribute @prefix. @prefix refers to the mechanism, not the
conceptual relation, and is not intuitive.
Interesting point. Thanks for bringing
7;t think most Web developers know the "namespace prefix"
terminology, and without that jargon, @prefix could mean pretty much
anything.
Regards-
-Doug Schepers
W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs
Hi, Manu-
Doug Schepers wrote (on 7/8/09 10:33 PM):
Hi, Manu-
Manu Sporny wrote (on 7/8/09 10:58 AM):
Sam Ruby wrote:
Manu Sporny wrote:
We will be developing further RDFa specs - whether it happens inside
the
W3C or outside the W3C is still up in the air.
I hope that this work can be
of surprises. :)
I have yet to speak with the Task Force about this proposal, but think
that it fits with the consensus at the moment. Here is what you, Chris
Wilson, Mike Smith, Doug Schepers, Dan Connolly, Philippe, TimBL (and
the rest of W3C) can do:
*Publicly* support an RDFa Interest Group
Hi, Ivan-
Ivan Herman wrote (on 12/23/08 4:51 AM):
> FYI...
>
> http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/12/rdfa_and_svg_tiny_and_the_rdfa.html
>
> Happy holidays!
Thanks for writing this and sharing it!
Regards-
-Doug Schepers
W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs
