This sounds intriguing. Do you have any owl ontologies you can share?
Daniel
At 08:36 PM 2/8/2006, John Madden wrote:
Dan,
This is also a big interest of mine.
I'm co-chairing the HL7 Anatomic Pathology SIG (and I'm in HCLS courtesy
SNOMED). With SNOMED's support, I'm embarking on OWL-izing
Hi Amit,
I asked about this project at the F2F - and requested to
download the project late last year.
Will it be available for download soon? I just checked your
website again, but still do not see any download links.
Since my interest is primarily memory based graphs, I'd be
very intere
A high performance RDF storage system is discussed in:
http://lsdis.cs.uga.edu/library/download/JK05-ISWC2005.pdf
Three of its applications are discussed at:
http://lsdis.cs.uga.edu/library/resources/
Amit Sheth
The VLDB paper is posted on Oracle's Semantic Technologies Web site at:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/tech/semantic_technologies/pdf/vldb_2005.pdf
We will be able to provide the UniProt subgraph for anyone else who is
interested. I'm now exploring the possibility of sharing all of the querie
All,
which of the groups will be ready to present their progress for next weeks
HCLSig conference call?
Thanks
Tonya
Tonya Hongsermeier, MD, MBA
Corporate Manager,
Clinical Knowledge Management and Decision Support
Partners HealthCare System
Clinical Informatics Research and Development
93 Wo
Davide Zaccagnini, MD, MS
Susie,
Can you point us to the VLDB paper?
Thanks
Davide
Medical Informatician
+1 617 261 8415 (Office)
+1 617 642 7472 (Cell)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.landcglobal.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In terms of preserving the bits:
>
> Just as, if you believe that the only way to preserve BioMed
> Central's content is to scratch it in a shrinking spiral onto 2"
> nickel disks (as recommended here
> http://www.longnow.org/projects/conferences/10klibrary/ ), then
> th
> > It's at least conceivable that Wikipedia may play an important role
> > in providing widely accepted identifiers for such high
> level classes
> > and instances, since the high level of usage of wikipedia would tend
> > to keep those high level concepts far better maintained and curated
>
Matthew Cockerill wrote:
> I agree that the details of gene function probably don't belong on
> Wikipedia.
>
> However, as these two recent articles
>
>
> Are the current ontologies in biology good ontologies?
> Larisa N Soldatova & Ross (Nature Biotechnology)
> htttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt09
