I'd greatly appreciate it if someone else would scribe this week? Can
someone volunteer?
Thanks in advance!!
-B
--
Brian Gilman
President Panther Informatics Inc.
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Planned 4-6-06 HCLSig Teleconference Agenda:
Time: 11:00 am EDT April 20 2006 in America/New York for a duration of 1
hour
Phone: tel:+1-617-761-6200 (Zakim) conference #4257 (HCLS)
irc://irc.w3.org:6665/hcls
Chairs: Eric Neumann, Tonya Hongsermeier
Scribe: Brian Gilman
a) Convene, take roll, r
On 4/5/06, Gary Schiltz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wonder if RAM is becoming faster/cheaper
> at a sufficiently fast rate to keep up with or outpace the growth of our
> databases of RDF triples - I suspect not.
Ian Foster :
[[
A useful metric for the rate of technological change is the averag
I haven't used it for RDF storage, but the page for SWI-Prolog's
Semantic Web library (www.swi-prolog.org/packages/semweb.html) claims to
have been "actively used with up to 10 million triples, using
approximately 1GB of memory." I wonder if RAM is becoming faster/cheaper
at a sufficiently fa
Matt,
what kind of an in-memory database do you use? I have done some preliminary
experiments with UniProt etc. data with about 2 million triples using our
OINK browser (built using the Wilbur toolkit). Performance was very
"interactive" (i.e., "snappy", notice my highly precise metrics here ;-)
Hi,
We recently implemented RDF-based queries of BioPAX formatted pathway
data (pkb.stanford.edu) and echo the sentiments about query and storage
technologies. In our case, scalability/performance is related to the
complexity of the query and RDF model and less on the parsing and
sending reso
