May I propose cataloging methodically all possible inter-ontology relationships
Here is an initial list. Feel free to add to them
Let A1, ... , An be concepts in ontology O1 and B1, ..., Bn be concepts in
ontology O2. The following possibilities exist:
A1 = B1
A1 subset of B1 (analogous to B1
Dare I suggest we postpone to September?
Joanne
On Aug 8, 2006, at 10:26 AM, Kashyap, Vipul wrote:
Xiaoshu,
There were no OTF Teleconferences as I was away on paternity leave.
Am just coming up for air!
The next one will be on August 22nd. We will discuss the use case
restructuring
and
Good point, Michael.I think there maybe ways to use some combination of NamedGraphs, SKOS, and Topic Maps to address different aspects of this general issue. We're working on this in the BIRN project and expect it will help us - and others - make use of the OBO Foundry ontologies - and data/litera
Hi Kei,
> It means that things might not overlap at
> the same level, but may overlap at different levels between different
> ontologies (entity modeled at a higher level of granularity may be
> mapped to one modeled at a lower level of granularity) .
Excellent point, and I just want to add
Thanks for the reminder, Xiashu & Vipul.I've not forgotten to get back to the BIOONT Wiki and provide the info I promised in the last call. I've actually got it partially written up in a text doc using Wiki syntax. I'll try to get that out there by next Monday.Cheers,BillOn Aug 8, 2006, at 10:26
Xiaoshu,
There were no OTF Teleconferences as I was away on paternity leave.
Am just coming up for air!
The next one will be on August 22nd. We will discuss the use case restructuring
and refinement
as suggested by Bill.
Will send out announcements later as I am headed to DDT in Boston today
Hi, all. I have missed the last few OTF telconfs. But I
haven't seen any notice lately. I wonder if there is still tel conference
scheduled or anythingelse?
Xiaoshu
