Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) wrote:
From: kei cheung
. . .
I agree that gene names are interesting use cases for URI/LSID. In
addition to synonyms (different terms may be used to refer to
the same
concept), we need to deal with homonyms (the same term may mean
different things). As
> From: kei cheung
>
> . . .
> I agree that gene names are interesting use cases for URI/LSID. In
> addition to synonyms (different terms may be used to refer to
> the same
> concept), we need to deal with homonyms (the same term may mean
> different things). As discussed in the BioRDF call y
Drew McDermott wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting "Miller, Michael D (Rosetta)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
You're correct here but it is the state of the art. Interestingly
enough, I've found that in general the biology-based scientists and
investigators are not all that bothered by this c
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Quoting "Miller, Michael D (Rosetta)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > You're correct here but it is the state of the art. Interestingly
> > enough, I've found that in general the biology-based scientists and
> > investigators are not all that bothered by this confusion and d
ACPP Tcon today:
1:00pm-2:15pm/17:00-18:15 UTC
Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 2277 ("ACPP")
Agenda:
1. Update on discussions with Tonya
and Davide at Boston, with regard to test case and ACPP ontology
2. Deliverables at F2F.
See you at 1:00 today
Helen
http://www.agfa.com/w3c/hche
