AJ,
this sounds really good. It would be great if, once they really have it
rolling, we would have a good description (sort of a 'business case') on
how and what they use from SW technologies. That would give a kind of
credibility, so to say, to the whole line of work that other publishers
(in or
I also don’t have Visio but I found
this free download of a Visio Viewer from Microsoft:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=3FB3BD5C-FED1-46CF-BD53-DA23635AB2DF&displaylang=en
Nevertheless, I agree with Bill that it
would be ideal if the XMI can be posted.
Many thanks, Vipul.I think this is a nice, concrete start and will certainly provide a solid foundation for discussion as we move forward - as will the Design Issues page you've created.If it's OK, I'd like to make a small request re: the UML file. I see MS has created an XMI export feature for Vi
BIONT Teleconference on Tuesday, 5th September
from 11:00am – 12:00pm US Eastern
Phone: +1 617 761 6200, conference 24668 ("BIONT")
IRC irc://irc.w3.org:6665/hcls
Browser-based IRC client: http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc
Agenda:
We will discuss the initial “seed ontology”
This is fantastic news, AJ! Having one of the major STM publishers make a commitment to provide new, SWTech and ontology aware publishing applications with a UI that makes this advanced publishing technology accessible to all authors is an absolute pre-requisite to making 21st century techniques f
Amit,We would also be interested in discussing ways of integrating SWAN - which is very "publishing-oriented" at its upper level- with such other efforts as PlosOne, and SPE. Why don't we have a discussion by phone this week? Tim Clark -
Exciting update for scientific publishing task: I met with Amit Kapoor
who heads the Topaz project under Plos. They are building a new
publishing
platform for PlosOne, http://www.plosone.org/, a new open access
journal from Plos. Amit is
interested in using ontology and semantic web technology to a
