Rather than "OWL vs. RDF", how about both? We used RDF for our
"instances" of measurement data and OWL as the semantic types for those
instances much like Bill suggests in the "OWL vs RDF" thread:
William Bug wrote:
For much of the semantic representation we need to do in large scale
biological
Please join our weekly Tcon on every
Wednesday, 3-4pm EDT.
SW_HCLS(APP)
Wednesdays
3:00pm-4:00pm et / 2000-2115 UTC
Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 2277 ("ACPP")
Agenda:
Possible solution: Reasoning on Inclusion/Exclusion
Criteria of Guidelines and Protocols.
Please join us at 3:0
Exploratory workshop: Connecting BioPAX to other Biomedical OntologiesBioPAX (http://biopaxwiki.org/) is a collaborative effort to create acommon format for representation and exchange of biomolecularpathways.As part of the on-going BioPAX development, we will be having a twoday workshop with Barry