Sorry to be resending.
For some reason, this didn't get to the list the first time around.
Cheers,
Bill
Begin forwarded message:
From: William Bug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: May 19, 2007 7:11:32 AM EDT
To: Eric Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Chris Mungall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Dan Brickley"
Eric --
You wrote...I see several potential categories of uncertainty, some
around the current reification discussions; here's a starter list that is by
no means exhaustive: 4. ???
Here's my 2 cents worth for item 4.
I'd say that an application or a reasoner that uses RDF or other
Request for Comments: SKOS Use Cases and Requirements: Working
Draft
2007-05-16: The Semantic Web Deployment Working Group has
published the First Public Working Draft of SKOS Use Cases
and
Requirements [1]. Knowledge organization systems, such as
taxonomies,
thesauri or subject heading
On May 18, 2007, at 7:40 PM, Eric Neumann wrote:
am I correct to assume that within HCLS, all RDF statements we are
considering are not facts, but assertions, that may in the future
be proven false, but never proven true?
I am very excited to hear this will be a W3C focused activity.
Sta
Chris, Bijan, Pat, All
Coming into this late, it seems to me that there are a series of use-
cases / requirements / wishes that people are trying to accommodate
made worse by real difficulties of the "use vs mention" variety. I
think there is a need of a high level document setting out the
