[Subject was RE: IDs + 5; everybody - 10]
A belated comment, since this thread occurred while I was away on
vacation:
In
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-semweb-lifesci/2007Jul/0203.h
tml
> From: Jonathan Rees
> [ . . . ]
> My opinion is that if you want to avoid the locator suggestion
Good news! Congrats and thanks, Eric!
If you prepared any new materials (additional slides, etc) or have
any tips on how you approached the presentation, please send them on.
Best,
Alan
On Aug 7, 2007, at 2:27 PM, M. Scott Marshall wrote:
Dear All,
Just wanted to note this success for H
Dear All,
Just wanted to note this success for HCLS:
At ISMB/ECCB[1] in Vienna, HCLS was well-represented. Eric Neumann
presented the HCLS demo[2] 'live' to an overflowing room. Eric's
presentation was very clear, well-paced, and had just the right level of
detail to help ISMB/ECCB folks understa
Great!
I think the creation of a comprehensive registry that mints and publicizes
URIs is well worth pursuing. Perhaps a few of us, including Bio2RDF, can forge
ahead and do what needs to be done?
Cheers,
-=Michel=-
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthias Samwald [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
> From: Chimezie Ogbuji
> [ . . . ]
> Well, it's one thing to be neutral wrt schemes and another to
> make a statement about the use of certain schemes (HTTP) as
> preferred for authors who are in the business of minting URIs.
> I'll just echo Michel's sentiments about not alienating
> communities
Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:
The HTTP scheme:
http_URL = "http:" "//" host [ ":" port ] [ abs_path [ "?" query ]]
Does not have any formal components for identify management (dates and
versions). A person (or group) who may not have control over webspace
but has a coherent theory they wish to expre
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 17:20 -0400, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
> Second, the view offered was my own and was perhaps too strongly
> stated. But I made it because I saw that recommendations were being
> made about decisions related to URIs and because I felt that given
> that we have an ongoing ac
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/OntologyTaskForce/BIONTDSEDCM
The information transmitted in this electronic communication is intended only
for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or
Alan,
I'm still waiting for an example that *can't* be solved using a HTTP
scheme. Do you have any? So far the best I have is that LSIDS point to
two "forks", the data and the metadata (meaning of these not clear,
btw). However I've already given an existence proof, in the way of a
proposed i
On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 18:17:10 -0400, Michel_Dumontier wrote:
> So a key concern for me is how I, as a user of public resources,
> should make statements about them on the semantic web. While
> certain data providers might already providing RDF/OWL data with
> some URI, what about those that have ye
10 matches
Mail list logo
