When commenting on a draft of the URI note, please include the
version number (37 or whatever) with your comments.
The URI note draft will be unstable until Monday afternoon 11/5, when
I will send out a message informing HCLS of its existence. (Sure got
leaked, didn't it?) If you read it
Clinical Observations Interoperability Telcon
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/ClinicalObservationsInteroperability
Date and Time:
November 6th, Tuesday 11:00am - 12:00pm EDT
Agenda
1. Questions on Functional Requirements Spreadsheet - Kerstin and Bo
2. Discuss Agenda and ge
On 05/11/2007, Jonathan Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear HCLS list - I haven't put the draft out for general review, but
> am planning to do so tomorrow.
> My reason for waiting is past experience of "draft fatigue" - most
> people will only read one draft of something. If you're one of
Jonathan,
I regret not mentioning this in the first place, but thanks for the
time and effort to put the note together. It makes debating it so much
easier ;-)
In general, I think my objections are related to philosophical
recommendations that are difficult or impossible to follow. I would
expec
Dear HCLS list - I haven't put the draft out for general review, but
am planning to do so tomorrow.
My reason for waiting is past experience of "draft fatigue" - most
people will only read one draft of something. If you're one of those
people please wait a while for the dust to settle.
