* Phillip Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-13 14:04+]
>
> > "PH" == Pat Hayes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Our Systems Team has fielded this request many times.
>
> PH> Its about time it bloody well listened, then.
>
> Yes.
>
> PH> By the way, the tone of the document [1]
On 15/11/2007, Mark Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Xiaoshu, This is a beautiful synopsis of the problem - THANK YOU for
> taking the time to write it up as well as you did! I will be using this
> in my lectures for sure! :-)
>
> What made me chuckle was how similar the DFDF concept is
Xiaoshu, This is a beautiful synopsis of the problem - THANK YOU for
taking the time to write it up as well as you did! I will be using this
in my lectures for sure! :-)
What made me chuckle was how similar the DFDF concept is to the LSID
concept... except that the LSID doesn't rely on
Hi,
I was asked to forward a job oppotunity in the University of Oxford for
a project manager post in a very Semantic Web-friendly life science
project.
With best regards,
Jun Zhao
Computing Officer
Image Bioinformatics Research Group
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford
South Parks
> "PH" == Pat Hayes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Our Systems Team has fielded this request many times.
PH> Its about time it bloody well listened, then.
Yes.
PH> By the way, the tone of the document [1] is extremely annoying. If the
PH> W3C were a company taking this attitude, i
I have written down my thoughts on the URI's identity issue and some web
architecture issues at "http://dfdf.inesc-id.pt/tr/web-arch";. The
writing mostly starts from the issue of "information resource" and
httpRange-14 but touched on how we are suppose to view the web architecture.
I think
