RE: An argument for bridging information models and ontologies at the syntactic level

> -Original Message- > From: Peter Ansell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 4:59 PM > To: Samson Tu > Cc: Kashyap, Vipul; Ogbuji, Chimezie; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > Subject: Re: An argument for bridging information models and > onto

RE: An argument for bridging information models and ontologies at the syntactic level

OK, we disagree on this point. I'd just point out that, if you are interested in working with HL7 RIM or BRIDG, you have a conceptual mismatch with them. [VK] I do not view it as a conceptual mismatch as I can get Snomed-CT the terminology by specifying a transformation on Snomed

Re: An argument for bridging information models and ontologies at the syntactic level

On 02/04/2008, Samson Tu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mar 27, 2008, at 3:58 AM, Kashyap, Vipul wrote: > > If your Acute MI is a subclass of Observation/Problem, then instances of > "Acute MI" class are observations of Acute MI, not instances of the disease > MI. An "observation" does not have s

[COI] Clinical Observations Interoperability, April 8th, 2008, 11:00am - 12:00pm EDT

Phone +1 617 761 6200, conference 24668 ("BIONT") IRC irc://irc.w3.org:6665/hcls Browser-based IRC client: http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc , OR http://ircatwork.com , Server: irc.w3.org:6665 Channel: #hcls Agenda: 1.