Sounds to me like an ontology exercise. For example, pre-coordinated
approach (knowledgebase) vs. post-coordinated approach (knowledge base)?
May not be a good analogy since I'm not an ontology expert. :-)
However, I wonder to what extent these two ontology approaches have been
(or have not
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22knowledge+base%
22&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Search : 1,030,000
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?
q=knowledgebase&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Search : 11,300
http://www.google.com/search?q=103+%2F+1130&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8 :
~91:1
Not really a fair fight ;-)
-Alan
On May
Knowledge base is generally written as two words. Try a google fight
on scholar.google.com.
-Alan
On May 13, 2008, at 8:31 AM, Matthias Samwald wrote:
I have made some small updates to the draft SenseLab conversion
document based on feedback from members of the group. See
http://www.w3.
I have made some small updates to the draft SenseLab conversion document
based on feedback from members of the group. See
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/hcls/notes/senselab/
Some added text is highlighted in green. Several minor changes are not
highlighted.
Cheers,
Matthias Samwald
DERI Galway,
Apologies for cross-postings. Please forward this email to anyone
interested.
(SECOND) CALL FOR PAPERS
---
Special Track: Towards Practical Application of Semantic Web
Technologies in Life Science and Medicine
at I-SEMANTICS 2008: International Conference on Semantic Sys
