+1
Quoting Donald Doherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On May 29, 2008, at 10:10 PM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
I wonder if we could include a line remembering Bill Bug in the KB
note. Something simple along the lines of
"In memory of our friend and colleague William Bug, Ontological Engineer"
On May 29, 2008, at 10:10 PM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
I wonder if we could include a line remembering Bill Bug in the KB
note. Something simple along the lines of
"In memory of our friend and colleague William Bug, Ontological
Engineer"
-Alan
+1
-
Donald Doherty, Ph.D.
Founder
Quoting Alan Ruttenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I wonder if we could include a line remembering Bill Bug in the KB
> note. Something simple along the lines of
> "In memory of our friend and colleague William Bug, Ontological
> Engineer"
>
> -Alan
>
>
>
+1
-Kei
Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
I wonder if we could include a line remembering Bill Bug in the KB
note. Something simple along the lines of
"In memory of our friend and colleague William Bug, Ontological
Engineer"
-Alan
+1
-Kei
I wonder if we could include a line remembering Bill Bug in the KB
note. Something simple along the lines of
"In memory of our friend and colleague William Bug, Ontological
Engineer"
-Alan
In the context of neuroscience, I hope things like "long-term depression"
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long-term_depression) won't get the system
confused. By the way, in mammalian phenotype ontology, there is a term called
"reduced long-term depression"
-Kei
Quoting "Kashyap, Vipul" <[EMAIL PR
At 5:34 PM -0400 5/29/08, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
On May 29, 2008, at 3:01 PM, Pat Hayes wrote:
BTW, one can also (of course) have multiple names for the same
entity, and (in OWL Full) link the various names to such things as
email messages, comments, etc..
Why the "in OWL Full" qualificat
On May 29, 2008, at 3:01 PM, Pat Hayes wrote:
BTW, one can also (of course) have multiple names for the same
entity, and (in OWL Full) link the various names to such things as
email messages, comments, etc..
Why the "in OWL Full" qualification here?
-Alan
eric neumann wrote:
Why not simply use to following trick on top of universal symbols?
rdfs:label="male" lang="en"
rdfs:label="Mann" lang="ge"
rdfs:label="mâle" lang="fr"
rdfs:label="男性" lang="zh-Hans"
...
>
Eric
If that's meant to be XML ... it isn't :)
(attributes of same name can't be
The National Center for Biomedical Ontology (NCBO) is one of the seven
National Centers for Biomedical Computing supported by the NIH
Roadmap. The NCBO is administered at Stanford University, with
partners at the Mayo Clinic, the University at Buffalo, the University
of Victoria, and UCS
At 2:32 PM -0700 5/28/08, Jack Park wrote:
Thanks for the question, Kai.
Topic maps in RDF:
There exists an OWL DL variant of the XML topic maps standard (XTM) [1]
There may be others. Certainly a search on "owl topic map" reveals interest.
I have an OWL Full variant of the TMRM "subject
maps"
11 matches
Mail list logo