Re: Remembering Bill Bug in the KB note

2008-05-29 Thread dlrubin
+1 Quoting Donald Doherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On May 29, 2008, at 10:10 PM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote: I wonder if we could include a line remembering Bill Bug in the KB note. Something simple along the lines of "In memory of our friend and colleague William Bug, Ontological Engineer"

Re: Remembering Bill Bug in the KB note

2008-05-29 Thread Donald Doherty
On May 29, 2008, at 10:10 PM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote: I wonder if we could include a line remembering Bill Bug in the KB note. Something simple along the lines of "In memory of our friend and colleague William Bug, Ontological Engineer" -Alan +1 - Donald Doherty, Ph.D. Founder

Re: Remembering Bill Bug in the KB note

2008-05-29 Thread kc28
Quoting Alan Ruttenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I wonder if we could include a line remembering Bill Bug in the KB > note. Something simple along the lines of > "In memory of our friend and colleague William Bug, Ontological > Engineer" > > -Alan > > > +1 -Kei

Re: Remembering Bill Bug in the KB note

2008-05-29 Thread Kei Cheung
Alan Ruttenberg wrote: I wonder if we could include a line remembering Bill Bug in the KB note. Something simple along the lines of "In memory of our friend and colleague William Bug, Ontological Engineer" -Alan +1 -Kei

Remembering Bill Bug in the KB note

2008-05-29 Thread Alan Ruttenberg
I wonder if we could include a line remembering Bill Bug in the KB note. Something simple along the lines of "In memory of our friend and colleague William Bug, Ontological Engineer" -Alan

RE: SenseLab note: some updates

2008-05-29 Thread kc28
In the context of neuroscience, I hope things like "long-term depression" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long-term_depression) won't get the system confused. By the way, in mammalian phenotype ontology, there is a term called "reduced long-term depression" -Kei Quoting "Kashyap, Vipul" <[EMAIL PR

Re: Cross Language with topic maps [was Re: ì ö‘` : KB note]

2008-05-29 Thread Pat Hayes
At 5:34 PM -0400 5/29/08, Alan Ruttenberg wrote: On May 29, 2008, at 3:01 PM, Pat Hayes wrote: BTW, one can also (of course) have multiple names for the same entity, and (in OWL Full) link the various names to such things as email messages, comments, etc.. Why the "in OWL Full" qualificat

Re: Cross Language with topic maps [was Re: ìö‘` : KB note]

2008-05-29 Thread Alan Ruttenberg
On May 29, 2008, at 3:01 PM, Pat Hayes wrote: BTW, one can also (of course) have multiple names for the same entity, and (in OWL Full) link the various names to such things as email messages, comments, etc.. Why the "in OWL Full" qualification here? -Alan

Re: Cross Language with topic maps [was Re: 答复: KB note]

2008-05-29 Thread Dan Brickley
eric neumann wrote: Why not simply use to following trick on top of universal symbols? rdfs:label="male" lang="en" rdfs:label="Mann" lang="ge" rdfs:label="mâle" lang="fr" rdfs:label="男性" lang="zh-Hans" ... > Eric If that's meant to be XML ... it isn't :) (attributes of same name can't be

New post-doc position: NCBO

2008-05-29 Thread Mark Musen
The National Center for Biomedical Ontology (NCBO) is one of the seven National Centers for Biomedical Computing supported by the NIH Roadmap. The NCBO is administered at Stanford University, with partners at the Mayo Clinic, the University at Buffalo, the University of Victoria, and UCS

Re: Cross Language with topic maps [was Re: ìö‘` : KB note]

2008-05-29 Thread Pat Hayes
At 2:32 PM -0700 5/28/08, Jack Park wrote: Thanks for the question, Kai. Topic maps in RDF: There exists an OWL DL variant of the XML topic maps standard (XTM) [1] There may be others. Certainly a search on "owl topic map" reveals interest. I have an OWL Full variant of the TMRM "subject maps"