I
Even through SNOMED CT cannot be made available as a, say, RDF
endpoint, I think it is still useful to consider (non-
dereferenceable) URIs based on SNOMED CT concept identifiers for
annotation purposes in Semantic Web applications.
And as an IHTSDO rep, I agree with Olivier on the a
There's a slight error in the UML diagram included in the previous e-mail.
A revised UML diagram is attached with this e-mail.
Thanks,
---Vipul
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kashyap, Vipul
Sent: Monday, Jul
Dan,
Looks like there is increasing convergence in our view points and some minor
divergences.
I'm confused...can you illustrate in UML, perhaps with the blood
pressure example? />
[VK] The UML Diagram illustrating WBC is attached with this e-mail (GIF
format). Look forward to y
2008/7/22 Olivier Bodenreider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> As the NLM guy on this forum, I probably need to clarify the intellectual
> property restriction issues with the UMLS.
>
> The Semantic Network is entirely owned by NLM and free of IP restrictions.
> Conversion to OWL has been studied in the p
As the NLM guy on this forum, I probably need to clarify the
intellectual property restriction issues with the UMLS.
The Semantic Network is entirely owned by NLM and free of IP
restrictions. Conversion to OWL has been studied in the past by... Vipul
(yes, "our" Vipul).
Representing the UM
