Thanks, Helen.
To make it more concrete. I've been thinking about some example queries
that I hope can be answered by the RDF data once converted. I wonder if
the following example quereis can be answered:
Retrieve a list of differentially expressed genes between different
brain regions (e.g
Minutes are now available from the LODD telcon.
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG/LODD/Meetings/2009-10-14_Conference_Call
Cheers,
Susie
Introduction to Implementing Ontologies in the Web Ontology Language
(OWL)
BioHealth Informatics group at the University of Manchester in
partnership with NWeHealth are pleased to invite you to participate in
their internationally renowned OWL Ontology tutorials.
It is to be hosted at
Hi Matthias!
I surrender to all your arguments below, and to those of Michel also :-)
I think we are simply talking from different perspectives and
life/career-situations that have different immediate needs.
I don't do "biological research" per se, so for me a warehouse
(semantically-ena
Hi Mark,
Moreover, warehousing in and of itself isn't research, nor is it pushing
"the state of the art",
I have become a bit weary of this interpretation of 'pushing the state of
the art' in this context. Looking at the set of standards, datasets, tools,
practices around RDF/OWL that we now
Hello,
There are many elements of warehousing semantic data that have yet to
be solved, both in terms of efficient algorithms for storage, indexing,
retrieval and visualization as well as in the core representation of
knowledge. In developing tools and applications, I'm quite sure that
both Mark
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 02:51:07 -0700, Egon Willighagen
wrote:
Just think of it like this: if you aggregated the data already in the
way the scientists wants it, he is no longer doing cutting edge
science (it's already been done!).
Perfectly stated! :-)
Moreover, warehousing in and of itse
Matthias Samwald wrote:
Hi Egon,
Linked Data focuses on crawling the web. At least, that's the
impression I have... yet, a single store to query is indeed much more
convenient... it's sort of contradicting:
I don't find that contradicting. Having URIs that resolve to something
useful is prac
Here's the reminder for Thursday's HCLS call. I am looking forward to
Nigam Shah's talk about the invaluable NCBO offerings at
http://bioportal.bioontology.org/. See
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG/Meetings/2009-10-15_Conference_Call for
up-to-date details, snapshot pasted below.
New participant
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Matthias Samwald wrote:
>> that said, I also don't think the final SPARQL end point should be remote
>> at all,
>
> So where should the final SPARQL end point be located? In a server inside
> the intranet of each organization? On the client side? How should it b
Hi Egon,
Linked Data focuses on crawling the web. At least, that's the
impression I have... yet, a single store to query is indeed much more
convenient... it's sort of contradicting:
I don't find that contradicting. Having URIs that resolve to something
useful is practical. Having a SPARQL en
11 matches
Mail list logo
