On 9/11/2010 2:04 AM, Michel_Dumontier wrote:
It's not a restriction on the predicates - it's a restriction on
instances of a certain class - like that of blood pressure
measurements. Checking consistency would tell you whether your data
conforms to the specification described by the ontology do
> > It's not a restriction on the predicates - it's a restriction on
> instances of a certain class - like that of blood pressure
> measurements. Checking consistency would tell you whether your data
> conforms to the specification described by the ontology document.
>
> Right, but tells whom, and
* Michel_Dumontier [2010-09-10 18:42-0400]
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Eric Prud'hommeaux [mailto:eric...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Eric
> > Prud'hommeaux
> > Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 6:41 PM
> > To: Michel_Dumontier
> > Cc: Chimezie Ogbuji; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
> > Subj
The next NCBO Webinar will be presented by Dr. Sean Falconer from Stanford
University on "Collaborative Patterns in Large-Scale Ontology Development
Projects" at 10:00am PDT, Wednesday, September 15. Below is information on
how to join the online meeting via WebEx and accompanying teleconference.
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Prud'hommeaux [mailto:eric...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Eric
> Prud'hommeaux
> Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 6:41 PM
> To: Michel_Dumontier
> Cc: Chimezie Ogbuji; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
> Subject: RE: [TMO] patient record normalization
>
> * Michel_
* Michel_Dumontier [2010-09-10 16:30-0400]
>
> > But then anyone merging two TMO documents with different units has the
> > normalization burden. If we pick a unit and annotate the predicates,
> > then the folks who would have to do the work of merging with non-TMO
> > documents (who would have t
As usual, I agree with Scott (this is becoming a habit! LOL! Scott, we
should really try to work together more closely!)
It speaks to a conversation that I had with my review committee this
morning about how The Web was built by simply being completely open.
Anyone could (can) publish an
Hi Eric,
The business of standardizing units reminds me of:
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2007/08jan_metricmoon/
followed by:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/462264.stm
For me, the story of losing an orbiter because of an accidental clash
between imperial and met
On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 16:08 -0400, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> If we pick a unit and annotate the predicates,
> then the folks who would have to do the work of merging with non-TMO
> documents (who would have to introduce some rules/canonicalization
> pipeline anyways) have the OWL hooks to automat
> But then anyone merging two TMO documents with different units has the
> normalization burden. If we pick a unit and annotate the predicates,
> then the folks who would have to do the work of merging with non-TMO
> documents (who would have to introduce some rules/canonicalization
> pipeline any
* Chimezie Ogbuji [2010-09-10 13:45-0400]
> Hello. Very interesting thread =). My $0.02. You say in your original
> email:
>
> >>> This greatly simplifies our life as we are otherwise likely to have a
> >>> variety of e.g. BP data in the database: 120/80 mmHg, 12/8 DmHg,
> >>> 16000/10667 Pa,
Hello. Very interesting thread =). My $0.02. You say in your original
email:
>>> This greatly simplifies our life as we are otherwise likely to have a
>>> variety of e.g. BP data in the database: 120/80 mmHg, 12/8 DmHg,
>>> 16000/10667 Pa,
>>> 16/11 MPa, 13 (PAM)
I'm not so sure if the idea th
[We apologize in advance for the reception of multiple copies]
DAMP 2011
Declarative Aspects of Multicore Programming
Austin, Texas
(colocated with POPL 2011)
January 23, 2011
[We apologize in advance for the reception of multiple copies]
DAMP 2011
Declarative Aspects of Multicore Programming
Austin, Texas
(colocated with POPL 2011)
January 23, 2011
We adopted the two component approach rather than the relation approach.
-Alan
On Sep 9, 2010, at 4:09 PM, Kerstin Forsberg > wrote:
The issue of units for measurements was also discussed (but not
solved?)
in the IAO (Information Artifact Ontology) group earlier this year,
see for example:
* Michel_Dumontier [2010-09-09 14:52-0400]
> Hi,
> I think the model where we separate the unit from the value is preferred
> (as per CPR) because it is highly flexible. You are right however that people
> could then refer to any unit, although an ontology could specify the unit
> involved (u
Hi,
I'll be at the caBIG meeting and probably tied up so won't be able to call in..
Daniel
- Original Message -
From: "John Madden" edu>
To: "w3c semweb HCLS" semweb-life...@w3.org>
Cc: "Christel Daniel" ,
"francois.mac...@sante.gouv.fr" , "MD MD Booker
MD" HealthTronics.com>, "Mary Ke
This is a reminder that the next HCLS Terminology conference call is
scheduled for this coming MONDAY.
Conference Details
. Time of Call: 1600h UTC (1200h U.S. Eastern Daylight Time, 1700h
London, 1800h CET, 0900h U.S. Pacific Standard Time)
. Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge
The issue of units for measurements was also discussed (but not solved?)
in the IAO (Information Artifact Ontology) group earlier this year,
see for example:
http://groups.google.com/group/information-ontology/browse_thread/thread/59724cd906d31841
19 matches
Mail list logo
