BioRDF Telcon

2010-09-12 Thread Kei Cheung
This is a reminder that the next BioRDF telcon call will be held at 11 am EDT (5 pm CET) on Monday, September 13 (see details below). Cheers, -Kei == Conference Details == * Date of Call: Monday, September 13, 2010 * Time of Call: 11:00 am Eastern Time (5 pm CET) * Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200

RE: [TMO] patient record normalization

2010-09-12 Thread Mark Wilkinson
I think there's a delicate balance between doing things "the right way" (whatever we as the "expert community" decides that means for us), and making things overly simplistic such that we then have to bolt-on a more correct solution in the future, potentially over thousands of resources. We (th

Re: [TMO] patient record normalization

2010-09-12 Thread Hilmar Lapp
On Sep 12, 2010, at 1:14 PM, Mark wrote: or :x :has-attribute [ a :systolic-blood-pressure; :has-value 120; :has-unit unit:mPa ] [ a :diastolic-blood-pressure; :has-value 80; :has-unit unit:mPa ] This is how we are modeling clinical data in the SADI project. Isn't this pretty much the

RE: [TMO] patient record normalization

2010-09-12 Thread Eric Prud'hommeaux
* Michel_Dumontier [2010-09-12 12:52-0400] > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Eric Prud'hommeaux [mailto:eric...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Eric > > Prud'hommeaux > > Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 5:13 PM > > To: Michel_Dumontier > > Cc: Lee Feigenbaum; Chimezie Ogbuji; public-semweb

Re: [TMO] patient record normalization

2010-09-12 Thread Eric Prud'hommeaux
* Chimezie Ogbuji [2010-09-11 13:33-0400] > Just wanted to pick up on the follow-your-nose argument. You can pick your friends, and you can ... I should say that I'm not a devout follow-your-nosist, but I do see it as the default behavoir on the SemWeb (until we get some nifty ontology repos whi

Re: [TMO] patient record normalization

2010-09-12 Thread Mark
or :x :has-attribute [ a :systolic-blood-pressure; :has-value 120; :has-unit unit:mPa ] [ a :diastolic-blood-pressure; :has-value 80; :has-unit unit:mPa ] This is how we are modeling clinical data in the SADI project. We've now switched to using Michel's SIO ontology, but we had an i

RE: [TMO] patient record normalization

2010-09-12 Thread Michel_Dumontier
> -Original Message- > From: Eric Prud'hommeaux [mailto:eric...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Eric > Prud'hommeaux > Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 5:13 PM > To: Michel_Dumontier > Cc: Lee Feigenbaum; Chimezie Ogbuji; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > Subject: RE: [TMO] patient record normaliz

Re: [TMO] patient record normalization

2010-09-12 Thread Eric Prud'hommeaux
* Kerstin Forsberg [2010-09-12 18:00+0200] > Eric, Chime, Michel, Alan et al.' > > This is a truly important discussion for all of us that work on > patient records / clinical data. > > Conclusions and recommendations on the issue of units for numerical > data values given semantic web standards

Re: [TMO] patient record normalization

2010-09-12 Thread Eric Prud'hommeaux
* Chimezie Ogbuji [2010-09-11 13:16-0400] > On 9/10/10 4:08 PM, "Eric Prud'hommeaux" wrote: > >> ..snip .. > >> I'm not so sure if the idea that databases with measurement data are likely > >> to have mixed units is very compelling in the realm of patient data. > >> Patient data is more than ofte

Re: [TMO] patient record normalization

2010-09-12 Thread Kerstin Forsberg
Eric, Chime, Michel, Alan et al.' This is a truly important discussion for all of us that work on patient records / clinical data. Conclusions and recommendations on the issue of units for numerical data values given semantic web standards and linked data principles from the combined intelligenci