> The DO is a OBO Foundry candidate, and there is an official OWL
> release [1], so wouldn't that be the authoritative source for URIs? Of
> course it's easy to replace the definition_citations, but wouldn't it
> be much nicer if the user can just download two 'officially' released
> OWL files and
hi cristoph,
"That looks like a very useful tool. Out of curiosity: how are the
ontologies/vocabularies loaded?"
i did not actually work on that piece so don't know the details. i do know
that it is still a work in progress, i've cc'd ravi who is the one who wrote
that code (the UI for the ap
Hi Jim,
we are aware of your work, of course; one of the action from the last
HCLS-SD call (on the isa to rdf conversion topic for the stem cell data
scenario) was to communicate with you, also as Scott suggested. We do
not use the limpopo, as isa tools already had their own set of parser,
val
A direct conversion of csv to rdf usually results in a entity-per-line
mapping. The magetab2rdf tool I made (at magetab2rdf.googlecode.com)
does a conversion of the mage tab into an rdf representation that is a
one to one mapping into the mage derivation graph and uses OBI et al
for classes and pro
Here's the reminder for Wednesday's LODD telcon. The main focus of the call
will be making progress on the paper.
Cheers,
Susie
== Conference Details ==
* Date of Call: Wednesday November 10, 2010
* Time of Call: 11:00am Eastern Time (ET)
* Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
* Dial-In #:
Hi Christoph,
on the topic of annotation tool...
On 09/11/2010 10:09, Christoph Grabmuller wrote:
3) I like the Excel to RDF converter, but it relies on the user
entering correct namespaces, names and database ids from various
places in a syntactically correct way. This requires knowledge of t
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 4:02 PM, mdmiller wrote:
> 2) Many 'things' are represented as strings (e.g. genes), which makes
> it often impossible to run a federated query against another endpoint.
> Gene names might somewhat consistent for HUGO, but what about other
> species? Also, just the simple va
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Helen Parkinson wrote:
> EFO only uses namespaces from a subset of ontologies, mostly those which are
> either OBO foundry approved,
> or in the process of this, or where is a lack of orthogonal ontologies. For
> disease we have many terms from many different source
