All I meant is that you can index the labels to do your URI substitution in
writing code (axioms/queries) in some program (exact matching here). Perfectly
reasonable for a selected set of orthogonal ontologies. Search/partial matches
would obviously need to match other requirements.
m.
From: p
Graham -- You wrote
*Who cares about readability of SPARQL queries? No-one is going to be
writing SPARQL queries. The tools should allow us to work at much higher
levels of abstraction than queries, and then the tool spits out the right
SPARQL query. The humans never see it. And those who do look
Agreed. I think it is pretty clear that there are trade-offs between
choosing identifiers that are mnemonic versus making them neutral, and
different people will weigh those trade-offs differently, so there will
never be full consensus on which approach is best.
David
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 08:2
> IMHO, if you're still coding the content of an information system by hand,
> then you're going to introduce errors. A database curator should never assign
> their own identifier - this is internal to the technology and the information
> system. If you're a programmer, you should query the reso
Was posted, and comments appreciated.
Was my comment posted about English being the standard language in aviation?
--- Joanne
On Jun 23, 2011, at 8:51 AM, Bob Futrelle wrote:
> There is a spectrum here, from black to white. A house number, 223 Main
> Street, is rather opaque,, whereas "The t
There is a spectrum here, from black to white. A house number, 223 Main
Street, is rather opaque,, whereas "The third house west of the southwest
corner of Main and Jones" is less opaque.
A real challenge is Japan, where the house addresses are numbered in the
order in which the houses were const
Hi Sivaram,
Identifiers, whether opaque or not, hold meaning when they identify some
thing (or things) - otherwise they do not serve their intended purpose.
Where there is disagreement is in terms of the syntax of the identifier. Some
want to incorporate language mnemonic and others use an alp
The issue of meaningless identifiers has been far more controversial than
imagined. After 70+ emails in the 2 threads
(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-semweb-lifesci/2011Jun/0080.html
and
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-semweb-lifesci/2011Jun/0125.html),
there is still
FYI -- some things we may find useful from this and previous workshops -- esp
if we follow michel's thought about tool development
Begin forwarded message:
> Resent-From: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
> From: "Pavel Shvaiko"
> Date: June 22, 2011 3:26:50 PM EDT
> To:
> Subject: 2nd CFP: ISWC'11
Nice presentation Adrian.
On Jun 21, 2011, at 7:26 AM, Adrian Walker wrote:
> Oops... Bad link correction:
>
> Slides 51-52 of
> www.reengineeringllc.com/Internet_Business_Logic_e-Government_Presentation.pdf
>
> Apologies, -- Adrian
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Adrian Walker
>
I'm jumping in here mid stream, with a back log of emails unread, but just
wanted to bring in something to think about, from another discipline.
Aviation. English is the standard language world wide. And this helps keep
air traffic safe (there are language issues and there are incidences, but
11 matches
Mail list logo
