>
> Let's say I have a graph G1 containing two statements s1 and s2.
>>>
>> Both s1 and s2 contain the same uri u1. Do you think the RDF specs
>> allow me to use interpretation I1 for s1 and interpretation I2 for s2?
>>
>
> If you are asking whether the spec tells you how to determine the truth
On 03/28/2013 01:17 PM, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
Hello David,
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 8:51 AM, David Booth wrote:
On 03/27/2013 11:02 AM, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
Hello David,
So if I understand your view correctly, then it could be expressed
in a language close to yours
On 03/27/2013 02:04 PM, Pat Hayes wrote:
On Mar 27, 2013, at 8:37 AM, David Booth wrote:
The RDF Semantics spec only tells you how to compute the truth
value of one pair at a time, but you can
certainly apply it to as many pairs as you
want -- in full conformance with the intent of the spec.
Hi Pat,
On 03/26/2013 05:52 AM, Pat Hayes wrote:
Hi David
Sorry if I got a little personal back there, I was getting
frustrated.
Thanks. I can understand the frustration of trying to communicate with
someone who looks at the world differently. :) [Insert joke here
about multiple interpr
When someone feels motivated, it would be great to have this thread summarized
(into a paper?)
Great to see the discussion.
I've only looked at a small fraction of the email messages that were posted, so
I may have missed this, was there any mention of tools that would pick up
potential proble
Hello David,
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 8:51 AM, David Booth wrote:
> On 03/27/2013 11:02 AM, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
>>
>> Hello David,
>>
>>So if I understand your view correctly, then it could be expressed
>> in a language close to yours as:
>>
>>"Some people believe that if
***Apologies for Multiple and Cross Posting***
Second Call for Paper
In the conference of ICBO-2013 or ICBO/CSWS/DILS Semantic Trilogy (at Montreal
Canada, 7 July 2013), there will be a workshop titled:
Vaccine and Drug Ontology Studies (VDOS-2013)
http://www.unbsj.ca/sase/csas/data/ws/semantic
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Michael Erdmann wrote:
> On 28.03.2013 06:18, Jeremy J Carroll wrote:
>
> I rather liked the GOTO/owl:sameAs presentation …
> and I am not sure that the problem can be explained away as modeling errors.
> To me it does seem that there is a case to answer … modelin
On 28.03.2013 06:18, Jeremy J Carroll wrote:
I rather liked the GOTO/owl:sameAs presentation …
and I am not sure that the problem can be explained away as modeling errors.
To me it does seem that there is a case to answer … modeling is necessarily
approximate and it is not realistic to expect e
On 03/27/2013 11:02 AM, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
Hello David,
So if I understand your view correctly, then it could be expressed
in a language close to yours as:
"Some people believe that if a URI occurs twice within a graph or
statement, it refers to the same thing. But this is a
10 matches
Mail list logo
