Re: linking a symbol with a dataset

2014-12-22 Thread Anders Riutta
To follow up, it appears the decision reached regarding linking a symbol with a dataset is to add two new terms to SIO: * http://semanticscience.org/resource/has-data-item * http://semanticscience.org/resource/is-data-item-in Anders Riutta - Original Message - > From: "Jim M

Re: FHIR as JSON-LD? [was Re: Minutes of last week's (Dec 2) HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup / W3C HCLS COI call -- Review of FHIR ontology approaches (cont.)]

2014-12-22 Thread Anders Riutta
This should be possible, because one of the key design objectives for JSON-LD is to allow existing JSON to be interpreted as Linked Data with zero edits to the JSON document, most of the time (paraphrasing from [1]). Anders Riutta [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/#design-goals-and-rationale --

Re: Minutes of last week's (Dec 2) HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup / W3C HCLS COI call -- Review of FHIR ontology approaches (cont.)

2014-12-22 Thread Lloyd McKenzie
The reference ranges would be declared as part of the observation instance - that information can change from measurement to measurement if the lab has multiple machines going, so it's not just an issue for data 10 years back. -- Lloyd McKenzie +1-780-993-9501

Re: Minutes of last week's (Dec 2) HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup / W3C HCLS COI call -- Review of FHIR ontology approaches (cont.)

2014-12-22 Thread Timothy W. Cook
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Lloyd McKenzie wrote: > Hi Tony, > > The RDF instances would always reference the standard resource and data > type profiles. They wouldn't ever reference narrower profiles, except > possibly at the top level. I.e. If I've got an address, the instance will > alw

Re: Minutes of last week's (Dec 2) HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup / W3C HCLS COI call -- Review of FHIR ontology approaches (cont.)

2014-12-22 Thread Lloyd McKenzie
Hi Tony, The RDF instances would always reference the standard resource and data type profiles. They wouldn't ever reference narrower profiles, except possibly at the top level. I.e. If I've got an address, the instance will always refer to that as hl7:Address, never hl7NL:postalAddress, even if

RE: Minutes of last week's (Dec 2) HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup / W3C HCLS COI call -- Review of FHIR ontology approaches (cont.)

2014-12-22 Thread Anthony Mallia
Thanks David, Exactly the point. However when I create the file of instances and represent as OWL/XML the root object is Ontology. We can refer to this file as something else - in RDF/XML the root object is RDF. I don't care what we call it as long as we understand what we are saying. Tony

Re: Minutes of last week's (Dec 2) HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup / W3C HCLS COI call -- Review of FHIR ontology approaches (cont.)

2014-12-22 Thread David Booth
Hi Tony, I think some of the confusion may be coming from your use of the term "ontology" to refer to RDF instance data. An ontology certainly can contain instance data (i.e., assertions about individuals as opposed to classes and properties), but I think people (including me) normally assum

Next Dataset Description W3C Note telco: Jan. 5

2014-12-22 Thread M. Scott Marshall
Dear all, Just a reminder that the next Dataset Description W3C Note telco is planned for Jan. 5, 2015 (not today). Cheers, Scott -- M. Scott Marshall, PhD MAASTRO clinic, http://www.maastro.nl/en/1/77/strategy-plan.aspx http://radiomics.org http://eurecaproject.eu/ http://semantic-dicom.org/ h