Hi!
I've recorded this as an issue in our github repo
https://github.com/joejimbo/HCLSDatasetDescriptions/issues/112
m.
Michel Dumontier
Associate Professor of Medicine (Biomedical Informatics), Stanford
University
Chair, W3C Semantic Web for Health Care and the Life Sciences Interest Group
h
There is a new version of the RDF Terminology mappings:
http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=File:Terminology_binding_in_FHIR.pdf
Based on the last discussion I have
. Aligned it with the Primitive Datatype document
. Added Codeable Concept
. Added ValueSet declaration mapping
. Added ValueSet bind
Hi Alasdair
It would be useful to have something that I can work with in Protégé/TopBraid.
It would also be reassuring to double-check all the inferences so that I could
confirm that the aggregated set of properties and classes in the current model
were consistent. In addition it would provide
On 27 Feb 2015, at 13:51, Gray, Alasdair J G
mailto:a.j.g.g...@hw.ac.uk>> wrote:
Hi Peter
We do not have an OWL file.
We currently do now have an OWL file, the only descriptions exist as the table
in the HTML document and a hopefully equivalent ShEx.
Would you be looking for an OWL file conta
Hi Peter
We currently do now have an OWL file, the only descriptions exist as the table
in the HTML document and a hopefully equivalent ShEx.
Would you be looking for an OWL file containing just the properties that we are
using from the other ontologies? What would you be looking to do with the
