RE: Proposed RDF FHIR syntax feedback

Lloyd, I agree. The use of prefix is a presentation issue and does not change the behavior of reasoners etc. If a user wants to add prefixes it can be done locally based on the IRI structure which is what we need to focus on. However we do want to use the dereferenceable URIs that FHIR designates

Re: Proposed RDF FHIR syntax feedback

All FHIR resources, value sets, etc. defined by HL7 have unique URIs, all rooted in "http://hl7.org/fhir/";. No-one else can define resources or data types. Profiles and value sets can be defined by anyone with any base URI. *Lloyd McKenzie*Consultant, Information Technology Services Gevity Con

Re: Proposed RDF FHIR syntax feedback

If we use a single namespace, do we assume the names of FHIR resources/elements/values are globally unique? Thanks, -Guoqian From: Lloyd McKenzie mailto:ll...@lmckenzie.com>> Date: Thursday, March 5, 2015 11:22 AM To: Anthony Mallia mailto:amal...@edmondsci.com>> Cc: Marc Twagirumukiza mailto:m

Re: Proposed RDF FHIR syntax feedback

Hi Tony, I wouldn't treat structure definitions as distinct from any other. The "vs" namespace is just for FHIR-defined valuesets. There will be 100s of value set namespaces out in the real world once more people start profiling, so I wouldn't necessarily recommend giving prefixes to any of them

RE: Proposed RDF FHIR syntax feedback

Marc, There is probably some right balance between having the prefix state the namespace or to have the dot notation as in FHIR. However there are some base FHIR URIs which might deserve prefixes: http://hl7.org/fhir/structuredefinition/ (when the FHIR website moves there) http://hl7.org/fhir/vs/

CFP: 2nd Workshop on Linked Data Qquality at ESWC #LDQ2015

LDQ 2015 CALL FOR PAPERS 2nd Workshop on Linked Data Quality co-located with ESWC 2015, Portorož, Slovenia June 1, 2015 http://ldq.semanticmultimedia.org/ /*News flash: Invited talk by Prof.Dr.Felix Naumann on "Brave new data, revisited"*//* */http://ldq.sem

Re: Proposed RDF FHIR syntax feedback

I fully support having a single "fhir" prefix. This will help at 'FHIR ontology' development level with making reusable predicates. Also at instance level it would help to include something that identifies order for array elements Kind Regards, Marc Twagirumukiza | Agfa HealthCare Senior Clinica