Re: Comment to ONC recommending RDF to help "standardize the standards"

2015-05-01 Thread David Booth
Hi Grahame, On 05/01/2015 06:05 PM, Grahame Grieve wrote: HI David I cannot let this go by without some comment. Therefore implementers are required to create their own workarounds to bridge these standards and overcome the incompatibilities. However, because implementers use diffe

Re: Comment to ONC recommending RDF to help "standardize the standards"

2015-05-01 Thread Jim McCusker
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 6:08 PM Grahame Grieve < grah...@healthintersections.com.au> wrote: > Suggestion 2: Recommend RDF as the best available universal information >> representation >> > > This completely misses the point; for the kind of disagreement that your > comments seek to address, RDF is

Re: Comment to ONC recommending RDF to help "standardize the standards"

2015-05-01 Thread Grahame Grieve
HI David I cannot let this go by without some comment. Therefore implementers are required to create their own workarounds to > bridge these standards and overcome the incompatibilities. However, because > implementers use different approaches, data still lacks interoperability > between implemen

Comment to ONC recommending RDF to help "standardize the standards"

2015-05-01 Thread David Booth
FYI, here is a comment that several members of the Yosemite Project steering committee submitted to the ONC today, regarding the ONC's 2015 Interoperability Standards Advisory: https://goo.gl/taHVAP The content of the comment is also included below, in case you are reading offline. Although th

Fwd: [ANN] nature.com/ontologies - April 2015 Release

2015-05-01 Thread M. Scott Marshall
-- Forwarded message -- From: "Hammond, Tony" Date: May 1, 2015 4:30 PM Subject: [ANN] nature.com/ontologies - April 2015 Release To: "public-...@w3.org" , "semantic-...@w3.org" < semantic-...@w3.org> Cc: Hi: We just doubled the number and size of our ontologies on the recently